首页> 外文期刊>Journal of criminal psychology >Just mercy through cultural and convict criminology
【24h】

Just mercy through cultural and convict criminology

机译:只是通过文化和罪犯犯罪学怜悯

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore Bryan Stevenson's (2014, 2015) call to action from within two emergent schools of thought in criminology, "cultural criminology," and "convict criminology",which share a special concern with the contributions that criminological research makes to a climate of social control and punishment. The author's central aimis to explore the capacity of what the author argues is a potentially under-leveraged tool of social change - the philosophies underlying and implemented in cultural and convict criminology. Design/methodology/approach - To demonstrate the potential impact of this research, the author draws upon a purposive sample of qualitative studies that exemplify the particular emotive, moral, and aesthetic goals central to Stevenson's call to action. The impact of the production of images of crime, crime control, and criminals that emerge in the development of the paradigms central to cultural and convict criminology is finally discussed in terms of Stevenson's four prescriptions for social and criminal justice reform. Findings - The underlying philosophies, theoretical assumptions, and methodological approaches dictated by convict and cultural criminology are uniquely equipped to make visible the forces linked to resistance to penal and social reform. Research limitations/implications - In synthesizing cultural criminology and the emergent convict criminology as guides to doing empirical research, and identifying each as embodying Stevenson's call to action, the author hopes - maybe not to extract those easily ignitable, invisible forces away from reform efforts entirely, but at least - to provide those who are interested with a more nuanced map of where they are not likely to live and breathe them. Stimulating and widening the criminological imagination might not satisfy our need to quickly and concretely apply a solution to injustice, but it might be what the problem demands. Originality/value - Stevenson (2014) arg
机译:目的 - 本文的目的是探索Bryan Stevenson(2014,2015)从犯罪学,“文化犯罪学”和“罪犯犯罪学”中的两名紧急思想中的行动呼吁行动,这与贡献有特别关注犯罪学研究使社会控制和惩罚的气氛。作者中央旨在探讨作者所讨论的能力是一个潜在的社会变革工具 - 基础和在文化和罪犯犯罪学中实施的哲学。设计/方法/方法 - 展示本研究的潜在影响,作者借鉴了定性研究的目的样本,举例说明了史蒂文森呼吁的特定情感,道德和美学目标。在史蒂文森的四个社会和刑事司法改革方面,最终讨论了犯罪,犯罪控制和犯罪分子的制作的影响,这些犯罪,犯罪控制和犯罪分子出现的文化和罪犯犯罪学的发展。调查结果 - 囚犯和文化犯罪学决定的潜在理念,理论假设和方法论方法是独特的,以便可见与抵制刑事和社会改革的力量。研究限制/影响 - 在综合文化犯罪学和犯罪罪犯中作为指南进行实证研究,并识别每个体现史蒂文森的行动呼吁,提交人希望 - 也许不会提取那些容易无点燃,无形的力量,完全从改革努力中取得改革努力。 ,但至少 - 提供对更感兴趣的人感兴趣的人,他们不太可能生活和呼吸它们。刺激和扩大犯罪学想象力可能不满足我们的需要快速,具体地对不公正应用解决方案,但可能是问题所需的要求。原创性/值 - Stevenson(2014)arg

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号