首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies >Integration of a neurodynamic approach into the treatment of dysarthria for patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease: A pilot study
【24h】

Integration of a neurodynamic approach into the treatment of dysarthria for patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease: A pilot study

机译:一种神经动力学方法对特发性帕金森病患者治疗扰动性的治疗:试验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeDifferences between standard dysarthria treatment and the same treatment with the integration of neurodynamic techniques tailored to the severity of dysarthria in patients with Parkinson's disease were examined. MethodIn total, 10 subjects with idiopathic Parkinson's disease and rigid–hypokinetic dysarthria were enrolled in this quasi-randomized, controlled, single-blind, pre–post study. In each of 12 therapy sessions the control group (n?=?5) received standard dysarthria treatment (usual care), while the intervention group (n?=?5) received the same treatment with the addition of integrated neurodynamic treatment (special care). ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups for either the pre-test (p?=?0.739) or the post-test (p?=?0.156) results. However, significant differences between the pre-test and post-test results within each group (intervention groupp?=?0.001; control groupp?=?0.003) were found. ConclusionsThe significant differences in the pre–post comparison within the groups may indicate a high probability of a positive effect of standard dysarthria treatment on the severity of dysarthria. In between-group comparisons, the study results indicated no evidence of a significant difference between standard dysarthria treatment with or without neurodynamics. Due to the small sample size, the effectiveness of the integration of neurodynamics into speech therapy cannot be definitively concluded for now. In order to be able to have generalized applicability, future studies with larger numbers of participants are required.
机译:检查了标准讨厌治疗的毒性和与帕金森病患者患者患者的严重程度定制的神经动力学技术相同的治疗方法。方法总共10例具有特发性帕金森病和刚性轻微失败的患者的受试者参加了这种准随机,受控,单盲,后研究。在12种治疗会话中的每一个中,对照组(N?=?5)接受了标准的讨厌治疗(通常的护理),而干预组(N?=Δ5)通过添加综合神经动力学治疗(特别护理)接受相同的治疗方法(特别护理)。对于预测试(P?= 0.739)或后测试(P?= 0.156)结果,两组之间没有显着差异。然而,在每组内预测和测试后结果之间的显着差异(干预组?= 0.001;对照组?= 0.003)。结论,组内比较前比较前的显着差异可能表明标准讨厌的治疗对扰动性严重程度的高概率。在组之间的比较中,研究结果表明,没有证据表明标准讨厌的治疗有或没有神经动力学的标准讨厌治疗的显着差异。由于样本量小,目前不能明确地结束神经力学整合到语音疗法中的有效性。为了能够具有广泛的适用性,需要增加更多参与者的未来研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号