首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies >Autonomic function and pressure pain threshold following thoracic mobilization in asymptomatic subjects: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Autonomic function and pressure pain threshold following thoracic mobilization in asymptomatic subjects: A randomized controlled trial

机译:无症状受试者胸腔动员之后的自主神经功能和压力疼痛阈值:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of two different mobilization techniques and a placebo intervention applied to the thoracic spine on heart rate variability (HRV) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic individuals. MethodsSixty healthy asymptomatic subjects aged between 18 and 40 years old were randomized to a single session of one of the three interventions: posterior-to-anterior (PA) rotatory thoracic passive accessory intervertebral mobilization (PAIVM) (PA group), unilateral thoracic PA in slump position (SLUMP group) or placebo intervention (Placebo group). HRV and PPT at C7 and T4 spinous process, first dorsal interossei muscles bilaterally, and muscle belly of tibialis anterior bilaterally were measured before and immediately after the intervention. A univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for baseline values assessed the effect of “Group”. Pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons were performed. ResultsThere were no significant between-group differences for HRV. A significant between-group difference for PPT in the ipsilateral tibia was found favoring the SLUMP group in comparison with the PA group. There were no significant between-group differences for PPT in the other landmarks. ConclusionA single treatment of thoracic PAIVM in prone lying and slump position did not alter PPT and HRV compared to placebo in asymptomatic subjects.
机译:ObjectiveTo比较了两种不同的动员技术和安慰剂干预在无症状的个体中对心率变异性(HRV)和压力疼痛阈值(PPT)的胸椎脊柱的影响。方法血清健康无症状受试者年龄在18至40岁之间随机分配到三个干预措施之一的单一会议:后到前(PA)旋转胸被动配件椎间动员(PAIVM)(PA组),单侧胸部PA坍落度(坍落度组)或安慰剂干预(安慰剂组)。 HRV和PPT在C7和T4棘手过程中,第一个背侧肌肉双侧肌肉和胫骨前的肌肉腹部双侧在干预后立即测量。对基线值调整的协方差(ANCOVA)的单变量分析评估了“组”的效果。对具有多个比较的Bonferroni调整的成对比较进行了多次比较。结果没有显着的HRV差异。与PA组相比,发现对Ipsilatallal胫骨PPT的群体差异有显着的差异。在其他地标中对PPT之间没有显着的差异。结论与无症状受试者的安慰剂相比,俯卧位和坍塌位置胸部PAIVM的单胸PAIVM的单次治疗没有改变PPT和HRV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号