首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies >Market power and allocative efficiency loss: a comparative analysis on China's tobacco and food industries
【24h】

Market power and allocative efficiency loss: a comparative analysis on China's tobacco and food industries

机译:市场力量和分配效率损失:中国烟草与食品产业的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The effect of market power on allocative efficiency is one of the most important topics in industrial organization and has undergone rigorous investigation since the 1970s. However, empirical studies based on firm-level data are relatively rare, especially with regard to China's tobacco and food industries. Accordingly, this research measures market power and allocative efficiency loss (AEL) of the main tobacco and food industries in China with micro data at firm level. Subsequently, it conducts a comparative analysis on them.Design/methodology/approach - This research applies the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO) model, consisting of five pricing and demand simultaneous equations to measure market power, and the AEL model to measure AEL induced by market power. Tomatch with the micro data at firm level, the study implements a change in the traditional NEIO model by abandoning the aggregating process. Findings - Empirical results show that China's tobacco industry, among five sectors selected, has the largest market power and thus the highest degree of AEL, whereas other sectors have apparently smaller market power and lower levels of AEL. Comparative analysis demonstrates a coarse positive correlation between market power and AEL in the selected industries. Ingeneral, the results accord well with the existing empirical findings and the reality.Research limitations/implications - This study has some deficiencies. First, owing to the limitation of high-quality data, the sectors analyzed in this research are insufficient to sum up all the characteristics and rules of China's whole food industry.Second, this research only analyzes seller market power and leaves out buyer market power, which could be a direction for future research.Practical implications - The relevant administrations should strictly limit the monopoly behaviors of enterprises and establish a favorable and competitive market environment, especially for the tobacco industry. This suggestion is precisely an importantcontent of China's Supply-side Reform.Originality/value - The research improves the NEIO model in that it can be estimated with micro data at firm level. To the best knowledge of the authors, very few empirical and comparative analyses exist on market power and AEL for China's tobacco and food manufacturers using micro data.
机译:目的 - 市场力量对自动效率的影响是工业组织中最重要的主题之一,自20世纪70年代以来经历了严格的调查。然而,基于企业级别数据的实证研究比较少见,特别是在中国的烟草和食品产业方面。因此,本研究衡量中国主要烟草和食品工业的市场权力和分配效率损失(AEL),在中国的微量数据处于熟悉的水平。随后,它对它们进行比较分析.Design/methodology/approach - 本研究适用于新的经验工业组织(NEIO)模型,包括五个定价和需求同声方程来衡量市场力量,以及测量AEL诱导的AEL模型按市场力量。在坚固级别的微数据传统,该研究通过放弃聚集过程实现传统的内部模型的变化。调查结果 - 经验结果表明,中国烟草业在五个部门中具有最大的市场力量,因此拥有最高程度的AEL,而其他部门具有明显较小的市场力量和较低水平的AEL。比较分析表明,所选行业的市场力量与AEL之间的粗糙正相关。 ingeneral,结果与现有的实证发现和现实吻合。研究限制/影响 - 这项研究有一些缺陷。首先,由于高质量数据的限制,在本研究中分析的部门不足以总结中国整个食品工业的所有特点和规则。第二,本研究仅分析了卖方市场权力并留下了买方市场力量,这可能是未来研究的方向。医务意义 - 相关主管部门应严格限制企业的垄断行为,并建立一个有利且竞争竞争的市场环境,特别是为烟草行业。该建议正是中国供应方改革的重要配置。程度/价值 - 研究改善了NEIO模型,因为它可以在坚固级别的微数据估计。对于作者的最佳知识,在中国烟草和食品制造商使用微数据的市场力量和AEL上存在很少有实证和比较分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号