...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agrarian Change >Aristocracies, Peasantries and the Framing of the Early Middle Ages
【24h】

Aristocracies, Peasantries and the Framing of the Early Middle Ages

机译:贵族,农民和中世纪早期的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper sets out to establish a general contrast between the traditions of agrarian bondage that characterized the West in the wake of the disintegration of the Roman empire and the peculiar vulnerability of the peasantry in the Byzantine, Sasanian and Islamic Near East. Within this general contrast between peasantries, I explore the differences between aristocracies in the late antique and post-Roman worlds, date the beginnings of the medieval expansion to the seventh century, and advance a critique of the way Chris Wickham handles the relations of production of the early middle ages. I argue that there was both more coercion and more complexity in the use of labour than Wickham's characterization of a self-managing peasantry suggests. The paper concludes by looking at some of the peculiarities of agrarian domination in the Near East.
机译:本文阐述了在罗马帝国崩解的破解和拜占庭,萨南和伊斯兰的农民的特殊脆弱性,在西部,在拜占庭,萨尼亚尼亚和伊斯兰近代的农民脆弱性之间建立了一个众所周知的农业束缚之间的一般对比。 在这一普遍对比的农民之间,我探讨了贵族和罗马后世界的贵族之间的差异,日期中世纪扩张到七世纪的开始,提高了克里斯威汉·克里斯·威克姆处理生产关系的批判 早期的中世纪。 我认为,在利用劳动力的情况下,劳动力比威克姆对自我管理的自我管理的特征都有更多的胁迫和更复杂。 本文通过查看近东部的一些特有的群体的特点来了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号