...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetic medicine: A journal of the British Diabetic Association >Insulin degludec/liraglutide ( ID ID egLira) maintains glycaemic control and improves clinical outcomes, regardless of pre‐trial insulin dose, in people with type 2 diabetes that is uncontrolled on basal insulin
【24h】

Insulin degludec/liraglutide ( ID ID egLira) maintains glycaemic control and improves clinical outcomes, regardless of pre‐trial insulin dose, in people with type 2 diabetes that is uncontrolled on basal insulin

机译:胰岛素Degludec / Liraglutide(ID eglira)维持血糖控制并提高临床结果,无论预临时胰岛素剂量,在患有2型糖尿病的人的人上都是在基础胰岛素上不受控制的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Aims To assess whether people with type 2 diabetes transferring from higher basal insulin doses (?20 units) to a starting dose of 16 units of insulin degludec/liraglutide ( ID egLira) benefit from ID egLira with/without transient loss of glycaemic control. Methods Post hoc analysis of DUAL V and VII assessed fasting self‐measured blood glucose ( SMBG ) over weeks 1–8, changes in HbA 1c, body weight and mean insulin dose over 26 weeks, and percentage of participants achieving HbA 1c ?53 mmol/mol (7.0%) by end of trial in participants with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with basal insulin. ID egLira was compared with continued up‐titration of insulin glargine ( IG lar U100) in DUAL V, or switching to basal–bolus therapy in DUAL VII ( IG lar U100 and insulin aspart), across pre‐trial insulin dose groups (20–29, 30–39 and 40–50 units/day). Results In all subgroups, participants treated with ID egLira experienced significant improvements in HbA 1c by end of trial, which were greater than with IG lar U100 up‐titration (estimated treatment difference –5.86, –6.59 and –6.91 mmol/mol for pre‐trial insulin doses of 20–29, 30–39 and 40–50 units/day, respectively) and similar to basal–bolus therapy (estimated treatment difference –0.16, –1.0 and –0.01 mmol/mol for pre‐trial insulin doses of 20–29, 30–39 and 40–50 units/day, respectively). Compared with IG lar U100 and basal–bolus therapy, ID egLira participants experienced weight loss vs. weight gain, lower rates of hypoglycaemia and a lower mean end of trial total daily insulin dose. In both trials, mean fasting SMBG decreased from weeks 1 to 8 across all subgroups, despite a temporary increase in mean fasting SMBG in the 40–50 units pre‐trial insulin dose group during week 1 [mean increase ( sd ) +1.1 (2.0)?mmol/l for DUAL V and +1.1 (2.1)?mmol/l for DUAL VII ], which reverted to baseline by week 4. Conclusions Regardless of pre‐trial insulin dose, ID egLira resulted in improved clinical outcomes, even in participants transferring from 40–50 units of basal insulin, despite a transient (?4 weeks), clinically non‐relevant, elevation in pre‐breakfast SMBG . (Clinical Trial Registry Number NCT 01952145 and NCT 02420262).
机译:摘要旨在评估2型糖尿病的人是否从高等基础胰岛素剂量(& 20单位)转移到16个单位的胰岛素Degludec / liraglutide(Id Eglira)的起始剂量来自Id Eglira,与血糖损失控制。方法对双v和vii的后HOC分析评估禁食自测自测定血糖(SMBG)超过26周的HBA 1C,体重和平均胰岛素剂量的变化,以及达到HBA 1C的参与者的百分比53 mmol / mol(7.0%)通过与基础胰岛素不受控制的2型糖尿病的参与者的试验结束。将id Eglira与双V的持续上滴定(IgLu100)进行比较,或者在预防胰岛素剂量组(20- 29,30-39和40-50单位/天)。结果所有亚组,id Eglira治疗的参与者通过试验结束,抗HBA 1c的显着改善,其大于Ig Lar U100上滴定(估计治疗差-5.86,-6.59和-6.91 mmol / mol进行预先试验胰岛素剂量为20-29,30-39和40-50个单位/天/天,类似于基础推注疗法(估计治疗差-0.16,-1.0和-0.01mmol / mol,用于预临时胰岛素剂量20-29,30-39和40-50单位/天/天)。与IGLU100和基底推注疗法相比,ID EGLIRA参与者经历了体重减轻与体重增加,低血糖率较低,较低的均线胰岛素剂量。在这两种试验中,尽管在第1周内的40-50个单位预防胰岛素剂量组中的平均禁食SMBG暂时增加[平均增加(SD)+1.1(2.0 )?用于双v和+1.1(2.1)的mmol / l用于双vii的莫酚/ l],其恢复到基线的第4周4.无论预临时胰岛素剂量如何,ID EGlira导致临床结果改善尽管瞬态(& 4周),临床上无关,早餐前SMBG的临床无关,临床上,参与者的参与者从40-50个基础胰岛素转移。 (临床试验登记号NCT 01952145和NCT 02420262)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号