首页> 外文期刊>Developing world bioethics >Defining Health Research for Development: The perspective of stakeholders from an international health research partnership in Ghana and Tanzania
【24h】

Defining Health Research for Development: The perspective of stakeholders from an international health research partnership in Ghana and Tanzania

机译:定义发展健康研究:加纳国际卫生研究伙伴关系中利益攸关方的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives The study uses a qualitative empirical method to define Health Research for Development. This project explores the perspectives of stakeholders in an international health research partnership operating in Ghana and Tanzania. Methods We conducted 52 key informant interviews with major stakeholders in an international multicenter partnership between GlaxoSmithKline (GSK, Vaccine Developer) and the global health nonprofit organisation PATH and its Malaria Vaccine Initiative program (PATH/MVI, Funder-Development Partner), (RTS, S) (NCT00866619). The respondents included teams from four clinical research centres (two centres in Ghana and two in Tanzania) and various collaborating partners. This paper analyses responses to the question: What is Health Research for Development? Results Based on the stakeholders' experience the respondents offered many ways of defining Health Research for Development. The responses fell into four broad themes: i) Equitable Partnerships; ii) System Sustainability; iii) Addressing Local Health Targets, and iv) Regional Commitment to Benefit Sharing. Conclusion Through defining Health Research for Development six key learning points were generated from the four result themes: 1) Ensure there is local research leadership working with the collaborative partnership, and local healthcare system, to align the project agenda and activities with local research and health priorities; 2) Know the country-specific context - map the social, health, legislative and political setting; 3) Define an explicit development component and plan of action in a research project; 4) Address the barriers and opportunities to sustain system capacity. 5) Support decentralised health system decision-making to facilitate the translation pathway; 6) Govern, monitor and evaluate the development components of health research partnerships. Overall, equity and unity between partners are required to deliver health research for development.
机译:目的该研究采用了定性实证方法来定义发展的健康研究。该项目探讨了利益攸关方在加纳和坦桑尼亚经营的国际健康研究伙伴关系的角度。方法采用52个关于葛兰素(GSK,疫苗开发商)和全球卫生非营利组织路径及其疟疾疫苗倡议计划(路径/ MVI,资助发展伙伴)(RTS,RTS, s)(nct00866619)。受访者包括来自四个临床研究中心的团队(加纳的两个中心和坦桑尼亚的两个中心)和各种合作伙伴。本文分析了对问题的回应:什么是发育的健康研究?结果基于利益攸关方经验的受访者提供了许多定义发展卫生研究的方法。答复落入了四个广泛的主题:i)公平伙伴关系; ii)系统可持续性; iii)解决当地的健康目标,第四次)区域承诺抵免共享。结论通过定义发展的健康研究六个主要学习点是从四个结果主题产生的六个关键学习点:1)确保与协作伙伴关系和当地医疗系统合作,将项目议程和活动与当地研究和健康有关的本地研究领导力优先事项; 2)了解国家特定的背景 - 地图社会,健康,立法和政治环境; 3)在研究项目中定义明确的开发组成部分和行动计划; 4)解决维持系统能力的障碍和机会。 5)支持分散的卫生系统决策,以促进翻译途径; 6)管理,监测和评估健康研究伙伴关系的发展组成部分。总体而言,合作伙伴之间的股权和统一需要为发展提供健康研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号