首页> 外文期刊>Developing world bioethics >Haitian people's expectations regarding post-disaster humanitarian aid teams' actions
【24h】

Haitian people's expectations regarding post-disaster humanitarian aid teams' actions

机译:海地人们对灾后人道主义援助团队行动的期望

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The way people at the receiving end of humanitarian assistance perceive this intervention may provide invaluable bottom-up feedback to improve the quality of the intervention. We analyzed and mapped Haitians' views regarding international humanitarian aid in cases of natural disaster. Two hundred fifty participants-137 women and 113 men aged 18-67-who had suffered from the consequences of the earthquake in 2010 were presented with a series of vignettes depicting a humanitarian team's action and were asked to what extent these actions corresponded to what ought to be expected from an international aid mission. Four factors were considered in the vignettes (a) whether the team worked in close association with local institutions, (b) whether it was composed of competent people who were prepared for their mission, (c) whether they treated people as a function of immediate needs, and (d) whether they behaved in a respectful way. Through cluster analysis, five qualitatively different positions were found: (a) Complete hostility to any kind of humanitarian aid (6%); (b) Strong hostility to humanitarian aid in the case of disrespectful attitudes or behaviors (4%); (c) Technical competence is the only factor that matters (25%); (d) Both manifestation of respect for the population and technical competence matter (38%) and (e) Undetermined (27%). Most Haitians expect humanitarian teams to be technically competent, but even very competent aid is not considered adequate if provided in an arrogant and disrespectful manner.
机译:人道主义援助接收结束的人认为这种干预的方式可以提供宝贵的自下而上反馈,以提高干预的质量。我们分析并映射了海地人对自然灾害案件的国际人道主义援助的看法。二百五十名参与者-137妇女和113名年龄在2010年遭受地震后果的妇女和113名男子均被提出了一系列描绘人道主义队的行动的一系列小插图,并被要求在多大程度上涉及到什么预计国际援助使命。在Vignettes(a)中审议了四个因素(a)该团队是否与本地机构密切合作,(b)是否由为其使命准备的主管人员组成,(c)他们是否将人们视为立即的职能需要,(d)是否以尊重的方式表现。通过集群分析,发现了五个定性不同的立场:(a)对任何类型的人道主义援助(6%)完全敌意; (b)在不尊重的态度或行为的情况下对人道主义援助的强烈敌对(4%); (c)技术能力是重要的唯一因素(25%); (d)尊重人口和技术能力的表现(38%)和(e)未确定(27%)。大多数海地人都希望人道主义队在技术上能力,但如果以傲慢和不尊重的方式提供,甚至非常称职的援助也不会被视为足够的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号