首页> 外文期刊>Human ecology review >Ecology in Context: A New Conceptual Frame
【24h】

Ecology in Context: A New Conceptual Frame

机译:背景中的生态学:一个新的概念框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper reports on a developing theoretical frame for human ecology. It is based on the archetypal conceptual frames or contexts that underpin all scientific endeavors and draws on the new powerful techniques of semantic analysis. There are three archetypal scientific frames that have emerged since the Enlightenment, referred to here as the mechanistic, systemic, and interactive frames respectively. These three frames are conceptually distinct and each involves different levels of analysis. Each also operates with its own fundamental units: things (substantives or nouns) in the case of the mechanistic frame, processes (actions through time or verbs) in the case of the systemic frame, and events (experienced qualitatively) in the case of the interactive frame. All three frames are equally important for developing scientific understanding, but they are often confused in the scientific literature. Semantic analysis enables human ecologists to unscramble such confusion by drawing on the concept of archetypal meaning (sometimes referred to as the core or invariant meaning) and by defining and elaborating variations in meaning rigorously through the use of a natural semantic metalanguage (NSM). In addition, semantic analysis enables researchers to analyze the way motile organisms internalize their experiences by mapping the conceptual frame that they have internalized and use to make sense of those experiences. Traditionally, ecology and especially human ecology has been concerned with the interactions of organisms with each other and with their environment or context. It is argued that the interactive frame offers better explanations for evolution, creativity, and the experience of properties than the other two frames and provides a powerful explanatory frame for human ecology.
机译:本文报告了人类生态学发展理论框架。它基于内在所有科学努力的原型概念框架或上下文,并借鉴新的语义分析的新技术。自启示以来已经出现了三个原型科学帧,这里分别称为机械,系统和交互式帧。这三个框架在概念上是不同的,每个框架都涉及不同的分析水平。每个人也以自己的基本单位运作:在机械帧的情况下,在系统帧的情况下,流程(通过时间或动词)的过程(行动)以及事件(在定性)的情况下交互式框架。所有三个框架都对发展科学的理解同样重要,但它们通常在科学文献中混淆。语义分析使人体生态学家能够通过绘制原型含义的概念(有时被称为核心或不变含义)来解读这种混淆,并且通过使用自然语义金属语征(NSM)严格地定义和详细阐述含义的变化。此外,语义分析使研究人员能够通过映射它们内化和用来了解这些经历的概念框架来分析动机生物的方式内化他们的经验。传统上,生态学和尤其是人类生态学一直关注生物互相和环境或环境的相互作用。有人认为,交互式框架为进化,创造力和属性的经验提供更好的解释,而不是其他两个框架,为人类生态提供了强大的解释框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号