...
首页> 外文期刊>Magma: Magnetic resonance materials in physics, biology, and medicine >Comparison between the phase contrast MRI and the Lattice Boltzmann method of computational fluid dynamics for a turbulent flow in vitro using an aortic valve phantom
【24h】

Comparison between the phase contrast MRI and the Lattice Boltzmann method of computational fluid dynamics for a turbulent flow in vitro using an aortic valve phantom

机译:使用主动脉瓣模型对湍流进行湍流湍流的相对对比MRI与晶格Boltzmann方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC MRI) is an established method of flow assessment in cardiac patients. Its limitations (turbulent flow, implanted stents etc.) can be circumvented by its coupling with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) [1]. Common CFD models suffer from impractically long computational times. In this work, a relatively new model based on a different approach is concerned, the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), and the results from the implemented LBM are compared to in vitro PC MRI data.
机译:相位对比磁共振成像(PC MRI)是心脏病患者流量评估的建立方法。 通过其与计算流体动力学(CFD)的耦合来避免其局限性(湍流,植入的支架等),[1]。 常见的CFD模型遭受不切实际的计算时间。 在这项工作中,基于不同方法的相对较新的模型,格子Boltzmann方法(LBM)和实施的LBM的结果与体外PC MRI数据进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号