...
首页> 外文期刊>HortScience >Long-term Performance of 'Delicious' Apple Trees Grafted on Geneva (R) Rootstocks and Trained to Four High-density Systems under New York State Climatic Conditions
【24h】

Long-term Performance of 'Delicious' Apple Trees Grafted on Geneva (R) Rootstocks and Trained to Four High-density Systems under New York State Climatic Conditions

机译:在日内瓦(R)砧木上的“美味”苹果树的长期表现,并在纽约国家气候条件下培训了四种高密度系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We conducted a large (0.8 ha) field experiment of system X rootstock, using Super Chief Delicious apple as cultivar at Yonder farm in Hudson, NY, between 2007 and 2017. In this study, we compared six Geneva rootstocks ('G.11', 'G.16', 'G.210', 'G.30', 'G.41', and 'G.935') with one Budagovsky (13.118') and three Malling rootstocks ('M.7EMLA', 'M.9T337' and 'M.26EMLA'). Trees on each rootstock were trained to four high-density systems: Super Spindle (SS) (5382 apple trees/ha), Tall Spindle (TS) (3262 apple trees/ha), Triple Axis Spindle (TAS) (2243 apple trees/ha), and Vertical Axis (VA) (1656 apple trees/ha). Rootstock and training system interacted to influence growth, production, and fruit quality. When comparing systems, SS trees were the least vigorous but much more productive on a per hectare basis. Among the rootstocks we evaluated, 'B.118' had the largest trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA), followed by 'G.30' and 'M.7EMLA', which were similar in size but they did not differ statistically from 'G.935'. 'M.9T337' was the smallest and was significantly smaller than most of the other rootstocks but it did not differ statistically from 'G.11', 'G.16', 'G.210', 'G.41', and 'M.26EMLA'. Although 'B.118' trees were the largest, they had low productivity, whereas the second largest rootstock 'G.30' was the most productive on a per hectare basis. 'M.9' was the smallest rootstock and failed to adequately fill the space in all systems except the SS, and had low cumulative yield. The highest values for cumulative yield efficiency (CYE) were with 'G.210' for all training systems except for VA, where 'M.9T337' had the highest value. The lowest values were for all training systems with 'B.118' and 'M.7EMLA'. Regardless of the training system, 'M.7EMLA' trees had the highest number of root suckers. Some fruit quality traits were affected by training system, rootstock or system X rootstock combination.
机译:我们对系统X砧木进行了大(0.8公顷)的田间试验,在2007年至2017年期间,在纽约州哈德森的Yonder Farm的品种中使用超级首席美味苹果。在这项研究中,我们比较了六个日内瓦砧木('G.11' ,'g.16','g.210','g.30','g.41'和'g.935')与一个Budagovsky(13.118')和三个砂根('M.7emla', 'm.9t337'和'm.26emla')。每个rootstock上的树木培训到四种高密度系统:超级主轴(SS)(5382苹果树/公顷),高轴(TS)(3262苹果树/公顷),三轴主轴(TAS)(2243苹果树/ HA)和垂直轴(VA)(1656苹果树/公顷)。砧木和培训系统互动以影响增长,生产和果实质量。在比较系统时,SS树是最不蓬勃的,但每公顷的生产率更高但更高效。在我们评估的砧木中,'B.118'具有最大的主干横截面积(TCSA),其次是'G.30'和'M.7emla',其尺寸相似,但它们没有统计上的差异G.935'。 'M.9T337'是最小的,并且显着比大多数其他砧木更小,但它没有统计地从'G.11','G.16','G.210','G.41'和'm.26emla'。虽然'B.118'树是最大的,但生产力低,而第二大砧木'G.30'是每公顷最富有成效的基础。 'M.9'是最小的砧木,未能充分填充除SS之外的所有系统中的空间,累积产量低。除VA外,累积产量效率(CYE)的最高值为“G.210”,其中“M.9T337”的价值最高。最低值为所有培训系统,“B.118”和“M.7emla”。无论培训系统如何,'M.7emla'的树木有最多的根吸盘。有些果实质量特征受训练系统,砧木或系统X砧木组合的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号