首页> 外文期刊>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology >Detection of aneurysms by 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients acutely suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm and comparison with digital subtraction and 3D rotational angiography.
【24h】

Detection of aneurysms by 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients acutely suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm and comparison with digital subtraction and 3D rotational angiography.

机译:急性怀疑颅内动脉瘤的患者通过64层多排CT CT血管造影检测动脉瘤,并与数字减影和3D旋转血管造影相比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Four-section multisection CT angiography (MSCTA) accurately detects aneurysms at or more than 4 mm but is less accurate for those less than 4 mm. Our purpose was to determine the accuracy of 64-section MSCTA (64MSCTA) in aneurysm detection versus combined digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and 3D rotational angiography (3DRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective review of patients studied because of acute symptoms suspicious for arising from an intracranial aneurysm, 63 subjects were included who had undergone CT angiography (CTA). Of these, 36 underwent catheter DSA; all but 4 were also studied with 3DRA. The most common indication was subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH; n = 43). Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed each CTA, DSA, and 3DRA. RESULTS: A total of 41 aneurysms were found in 28 patients. The mean size was 6.09 mm on DSA/3DRA and 5.98 mm on 64MSCTA. kappa was excellent (0.97) between the aneurysm size on 64MSCTA and DSA/3DRA. Ultimately, 37 aneurysms were detected by DSA/3DRA in 25 of the 36 patients who underwent conventional angiography. The reviewers noted four 1- to 1.5-mm sessile outpouchings only on 3DRA; none were considered a source of SAH. One 64MSCTA was false positive, whereas one 2-mm aneurysm was missed by CTA. The sensitivity of CTA for aneurysms less than 4 mm was 92.3%, whereas it was 100% for those 4-10 mm and more than 10 mm, excluding the indeterminate, sessile lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with the available literature, 64MSCTA may have improved the detection of less than 4-mm aneurysms compared with 4- or 16-section CTA. However, the combination of DSA with 3DRA is currently the most sensitive technique to detect untreated aneurysms and should be considered in suspicious cases of SAH where the aneurysm is not depicted by 64MSCTA, because 64MSCTA may occasionally miss aneurysms less than 3-4 mm size.
机译:背景与目的:四节断层CT血管造影(MSCTA)可以准确地检测到大于或等于4 mm的动脉瘤,但对于小于或等于4 mm的动脉瘤则不那么准确。我们的目的是确定64节MSCTA(64MSCTA)在动脉瘤检测与数字减影血管造影(DSA)和3D旋转血管造影(3DRA)结合中的准确性。材料与方法:在对因颅内动脉瘤引起的可疑急性症状进行研究的患者的回顾性研究中,纳入了63位接受了CT血管造影(CTA)的受试者。其中36例接受了导管DSA检查。除了4个以外,其他所有对象都使用3DRA进行了研究。最常见的适应症是蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH; n = 43)。两名神经放射科医生独立审查了每个CTA,DSA和3DRA。结果:28例患者共发现41个动脉瘤。 DSA / 3DRA的平均尺寸为6.09毫米,64MSCTA的平均尺寸为5.98毫米。在64MSCTA和DSA / 3DRA上的动脉瘤大小之间,kappa极好(0.97)。最终,在接受常规血管造影的36例患者中,有25例通过DSA / 3DRA检测到37个动脉瘤。审稿人仅在3DRA上注意到4个1到1.5毫米的无柄小袋。没有人被认为是SAH的来源。 1例64MSCTA为假阳性,而1例2 mm的动脉瘤被CTA遗漏。 CTA对小于4毫米的动脉瘤的敏感性为92.3%,而对于4-10毫米和大于10毫米的动脉瘤,CTA的敏感性为100%,不包括不确定的,无蒂的病变。结论:与现有文献相比,与4节或16节CTA相比,64MSCTA可能改善了对小于4mm动脉瘤的检测。但是,DSA与3DRA的组合目前是检测未经治疗的动脉瘤的最灵敏技术,在可疑的SAH病例中,如果64MSCTA没有描绘出动脉瘤,则应考虑将其考虑在内,因为64MSCTA有时可能会丢失小于3-4 mm的动脉瘤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号