...
首页> 外文期刊>Health services research: HSR >Apple Pickers or Federal Judges: Strong versus Weak Incentives in Physician Payment
【24h】

Apple Pickers or Federal Judges: Strong versus Weak Incentives in Physician Payment

机译:Apple拣货人或联邦法官:在医生付款中强大而弱势激励

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is broad agreement that paying for value in health care makes more sense than simply paying for volume (VanLare and Conway 2012; Porter and Lee 2015). Reflecting this agreement, in January 2015, Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell announced that HHS has set a goal of tying 85 percent of all traditional Medicare payments to quality or value by 2016 and 90 percent by 2018, and of having 30 percent of all traditional Medicare payments be made through alternative payment models, such as accountable care organizations (ACOs) or bundled payment arrangements, by the end of 2016, and 50 percent by the end of 2018 (Burwell 2015). The goals of shifting payments to alternative payment models and linking remaining fee-for-service payments to quality are also strongly reflected in the MACRA legislation enacted in 2015 (Steinbrook 2015).
机译:有广泛的协议,在医疗保健中支付价值,比简单地支付卷(vanlare和2012年的康沃尔;搬运工和李2015)。 反映本协议,2015年1月,卫生和人际关系秘书Sylvia Mathews Burwell宣布,HHS将85%的人占据2016年到2016年至2016年的90%,以及拥有30%的素质或价值 通过替代支付模型的所有传统医疗费用的百分比,例如负责任的组织(ACOS)或捆绑的付款安排,到2016年底,到2018年底的50%(布尔韦尔2015年)。 在2015年的Macra立法(Steinbrook 2015)中也强烈反映了将支付给替代支付模式以及将剩余的服务费支付联系起来的支付和将剩余的服务费用联系在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号