【24h】

Incidence of Incisional Hernia After Emergency Subcostal Unilateral Laparotomy: Does Augmentation Prophylaxis Play a Role?

机译:紧急骨囊单侧剖腹修赛后切口疝的发病率:增加预防是否发挥作用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Few data are available about the frequency of incisional hernia in an emergency subcostal laparotomy. Our objective is to analyze the incidence of incisional hernia after emergency subcostal laparotomy and evaluate if prophylactic mesh could help prevent it. Methods This study is a monocentric retrospective analysis following STROBE guideline statements of all patients who underwent an emergency subcostal laparotomy between January 2011 and July 2017 in our University Hospital. We compared complications and incidence of incisional hernia between patients who received sutures (Group S; N = 203) and patients with prophylactic onlay mesh (Group M; N = 80). A multivariate risk factor analysis of incisional hernia was performed. An incisional hernia-estimated risk calculator equation was created. Results A total of 283 patients were analyzed. There were 80 patients in Group M and 203 in Group S. In short-term outcomes, length of surgery (213 +/- 115 min vs 165 +/- 73.3 min, P = 0.001) and hospital stay (16.4 +/- 18.7 vs 11.6 days +/- 13.4, P = 0.038) were longer in Group M. Long-term follow-up was conducted in 207 patients with a mean follow-up time of 39.3 +/- 23 months. Incisional hernia was detected in 29 (19.1%) patients in Group S but in only two (3.8%) patients in Group M (P = 0.008). In the multivariate analysis, a risk factor analysis included wound infection (4.91 HR (2.12-11.4); P < 0.001), previous hernia repair (2.86 HR (1.24-6.61); P = 0.014), and shock (2.64 HR (1.01-6.93); P = 0.048). Conclusions The incidence of incisional hernia after emergency subcostal laparotomy is high. Risk factors are wound infection, shock, and previous hernia surgery. The use of prophylactic mesh augmentation was safe and reduced the incidence of incisional hernia.
机译:关于紧急亚骨剖腹产术中的切口疝的频率可以获得少数数据。我们的目的是分析紧急骨囊切开术后切口疝的发病率,并评估预防性网格是否有助于预防其。方法本研究是单眼的回顾性分析,后者在2011年1月至2017年7月在2017年1月至2017年7月在我们的大学医院进行了紧急潜在患者的所有患者进行了单整个回顾性分析。我们比较了接受缝合线(S; n = 203)和预防性甲状腺网(M; N = 80组)的患者之间的并发症和发病率。进行切口疝的多变量风险因子分析。创建了切口疝气估计的风险计算器方程。结果共分析了283名患者。患有80名患者,患有80名患者。在S中的短期结果,手术长度(213 +/- 115分钟,165 +/- 73.3分钟,P = 0.001)和住院住宿(16.4 +/- 18.7 vs 11.6天+/- 13.4,p = 0.038)在M.中,在207名患者中进行了长期随访,其平均随访时间为39.3 +/- 23个月。在S组中的29例(19.1%)患者中检测到切口疝,但在M组中只有两个(3.8%)患者(P = 0.008)。在多变量分析中,危险因素分析包括伤口感染(4.91小时(2.12-11.4); p <0.001),先前的疝气修复(2.86小时(1.24-6.61); p = 0.014)和休克(2.64小时(1.01 -6.93); p = 0.048)。结论紧急亚颅剖腹术后切口疝的发病率高。风险因素是伤口感染,休克和以前的疝气手术。使用预防性网格增强的使用是安全的,减少了切口疝的发病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号