首页> 外文期刊>AJOB Primary Research >Moral Stress, Moral Practice, and Ethical Climate in Community-Based Drug-Use Research: Views From the Front Line
【24h】

Moral Stress, Moral Practice, and Ethical Climate in Community-Based Drug-Use Research: Views From the Front Line

机译:基于社区的毒品使用研究中的道德压力,道德实践和道德氛围:前线观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The role of front-line researchers, those whose responsibilities include face-to-face contact with participants, is critical to ensuring the responsible conduct of community-based drug use research. To date, there has been little empirical examination of how front-line researchers perceive the effectiveness of ethical procedures in their real-world application and the moral stress they may experience when adherence to scientific procedures appears to conflict with participant protections. Methods: This study represents a first step in applying psychological science to examine the work-related attitudes, ethics climate, and moral dilemmas experienced by a national sample of 275 front-line staff members whose responsibilities include face-to-face interaction with participants in community-based drug-use research. Using an anonymousWeb-based survey we psychometrically evaluated and examined relationships among six new scales tapping moral stress (frustration in response to perceived barriers to conducting research in a morally appropriate manner); organizational ethics climate; staff support; moral practice dilemmas (perceived conflicts between scientific integrity and participant welfare); research commitment; and research mistrust. Results: As predicted, front-line researchers who evidence a strong commitment to their role in the research process and who perceive their organizations as committed to research ethics and staff support experienced lower levels of moral stress. Front-line researchers whowere distrustful of the research enterprise and frequently grappledwithmoral practice dilemmas reported higher levels of moral stress. Conclusion: Applying psychometrically reliable scales to empirically examine research ethics challenges can illuminate specific threats to scientific integrity and human subjects protections encountered by front-line staff and suggest organizational strategies for reducing moral stress and enhancing the responsible conduct of research.
机译:背景:前线研究人员的角色,包括与参与者面对面的接触,对确保负责任地开展基于社区的药物使用研究至关重要。迄今为止,关于前线研究人员如何看待道德规程在实际应用中的有效性以及在遵守科学规程与参与者保护相抵触时可能遭受的道德压力的实证研究很少。方法:这项研究代表了应用心理学科学来研究由275名一线工作人员组成的全国样本所经历的与工作相关的态度,道德氛围和道德困境的第一步,他们的职责包括与参与者的面对面互动基于社区的毒品使用研究。我们使用匿名的基于网络的调查,从心理上评估和检验了六个新的量表之间的关系,这些量表消除了道德压力(对以道德上适当的方式进行研究的感知障碍感到沮丧);组织道德氛围;人员支持;道德实践困境(科学诚信与参与者福利之间的感知冲突);研究承诺;和研究不信任。结果:正如预料的那样,一线研究人员证明了自己在研究过程中的坚定承诺,并认为自己的组织致力于研究道德和员工支持,因此他们面临的道德压力较低。一线研究人员对研究企业不信任,并经常与道德实践困境作斗争,他们报告了更高的道德压力。结论:运用心理计量学上可靠的量表对研究伦理挑战进行实证研究,可以揭示一线员工对科学诚信和对人类主体保护的特定威胁,并提出减少道德压力和增强负责任研究行为的组织策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号