首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Roadside design assessment in an urban, low-density environment in the Gulf Cooperation Council region
【24h】

Roadside design assessment in an urban, low-density environment in the Gulf Cooperation Council region

机译:海湾合作委员会区域城市,低密度环境中的路边设计评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Proper roadside design is crucial in order to mitigate the consequences associated with single-vehicle run-off-road (SVROR) crashes. However, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region lacks in-depth, detailed information on its roadside design status. Hence, there is a need for an in-service evaluation of roadside design in the GCC region. The objective of this study is to assess the existing roadside design in a medium-sized, low-density city in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).Methods: A multiyear crash database was used to identify 116 locations where SVROR injury crashes occurred between 2013 and 2016 in the city of Al Ain in the UAE. Visits to these locations were made in order to assess their roadside design. Subsequently, the collected data were analyzed. Roadside design was classified based on whether or not it deviated from roadside design guidelines. The guidelines adopted as a benchmark were those contained in the 2012 Abu Dhabi Department of Transport Roadside Design Guide (RDG) and/or those in the 2011 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) RDG. It is worth stressing that local guidelines are heavily based on the 2011 AASHTO RDG.Results: The study found that almost one quarter of all SVROR crashes resulted in injuries. The study also found that a staggering 80.17% of the SVROR injury crashes investigated occurred at locations where roadside design deviated from the benchmark. Lack of an adequate clear zone was the main cause of noncompliant locations. Most SVROR injury crash locations containing roadside design with deviations from the benchmark were located on roads with posted speed limits of 100 kph or higher. Light poles, trees, curbs, and barriers were the most harmful objects most often struck, and tree collisions accounted for the highest number of severe crashes. Ninety-four and 86% of all studied locations containing light poles and trees, respectively, were found to be noncompliant with the benchmark. Twenty-eight percent of all SVROR injury crashes involved a rollover. All rollovers were preceded by a collision with a tree, pole, guardrail, or curb. Forty-four percent of all rollover crashes resulted in severe injuries.Conclusions: Significant revision of the existing roadside design not only in the area studied but throughout the UAE is recommended. The authors propose measures that may be useful in making roadside design in the area studied better align with the benchmark requirements.
机译:目标:适当的路边设计是至关重要的,以减轻与单车越野(SVROR)崩溃相关的后果。但是,海湾合作委员会(GCC)区域缺乏关于其路边设计地位的详细信息。因此,需要在GCC区域中进行路边设计的在职评估。本研究的目的是评估在阿拉伯联合酋长国(阿联酋)中的中型低密度城市中现有的路边设计。方法:使用多年崩溃数据库来识别2013年间发生了SVROR损伤崩溃的116个位置和2016年在阿联酋的Al Ain市。进行对这些地点进行访问,以评估其路边设计。随后,分析了收集的数据。基于是否偏离路边设计指南,分类为路边设计。作为基准采用的指导方针是2012年阿布扎比运输路旁设计指南(RDG)和/或2011年美国国家公路和交通官员(AASHTO)RDG的股票交易所。值得强调的是,当地指南基于2011年AASHTO rdg.results:该研究发现,所有SVROR崩溃的几乎四分之一导致伤害。该研究还发现,在基准偏离的路边设计的位置,调查的SVROR损伤的惊人的80.17%的崩溃。缺乏足够的清晰区是非符合人选的主要原因。大多数含有路边设计的SVROR损伤崩溃位置,具有与基准偏差的偏差位于道路上,透明速度限制为100 kph或更高。光杆,树木,遏制和障碍是最有害的物体,最常见的物品,树碰撞占剧烈崩溃的最多。发现含有光杆和树木的所有研究的九十四和86%,被发现与基准相符合。所有SVROR损伤的二十八个患者涉及翻转。所有滚动都是碰撞与树,杆,护栏或路缘。四十四个折叠崩溃导致严重伤害。结论:不仅在研究所研究的地区,而且建议在整个阿联酋的地区进行大幅修订。作者提出了在该区域进行路边设计方面可能有用的措施提出了对基准要求进行更好的对齐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号