...
首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics >Theoretical and numerical analysis of creep crack initiation combined with primary and secondary stresses
【24h】

Theoretical and numerical analysis of creep crack initiation combined with primary and secondary stresses

机译:蠕变裂纹引发与初级和次级应力联合的理论和数值分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this work, the creep crack initiation time (CCI) considering the residual stress effects were investigated by numerical simulation and theoretical approaches based on the ductility exhaustion model. The redistribution of stress under the combined loading condition (i.e. the tensile residual stress generated by the pre-compressed loads and primary loads) was taken into account. The elastic follow-up factor, Z, as well as the reference stress method, was considered as part of the theoretical method. The suitability of the theoretical method to the conditions that included combined primary and secondary stresses was then investigated. Reasonable and conservative predictions of CCI time could be obtained from the theoretical solutions when the elastic follow-up factor, Z, was taken into account within the K-Riedel-Rice (K-RR) controlled model (initiation initially under the elastic K field and then under transient creep stress conditions, the Riedel-Rice (RR)) and the Hutchinson-Rice-Rosengren-Riedel-Rice (HRR-RR) controlled model (initiation initially under the elastic-plastic Hutchinson-Rice-Rosengren (HRR) field and then under RR controlled stress field) compared with finite element (FE) solutions. K RR was more suitable when the primary stress intensity factor K-I(P) was below 15 MPa m(1/2), and HRR-RR was more accurate when K-I(P) was beyond 15 MPa m(1/2). However, RRss (initiation under the steady state creep) values were much higher than the FE solutions, but K (initiation under the elastic stress intensity factor K-controlled stress field) controlled values seriously underestimated the initiation times. HRR (initiation under the elastic plastic HRR-controlled stress field) values underestimated the initiation time when load level KIP was less than 27 MPa m(1/2), but slightly overestimated when K-I(P) was larger than 27 MPa m(1/2). The HRR-RR and HRR solutions were much close and may be a little unconservative at the high load levels (K-I(P) 27 MPa m(1/2)
机译:在这项工作中,通过基于延展性耗尽模型的数值模拟和理论方法研究了考虑残余应力效应的蠕变裂纹启动时间(CCI)。考虑了组合负载条件下应力的重新分布(即,通过预压制负载和主要负载产生的拉伸残余应力)。弹性随访系数,Z以及参考应力方法被认为是理论方法的一部分。然后研究了理论方法对包括组合初级和次要应力的条件的适用性。在K-Riedel-RIED(K-RR)控制模型中考虑弹性随访偶数Z时,可以从理论溶液中获得合理和保守的预测,在K-Riedel-RID-RIS(K-RR)控制模型中(最初在弹性K场下启动然后在瞬态蠕变胁迫条件下,Riedel-Riedel-Ried(RR))和Hutchinson-Rice-Rosengren-Riedel-Riedel-Riedel-rice(HRR-RR)控制模型(最初在弹性塑料Hutchinson-Rice-Rosengren(HRR)下启动与有限元(Fe)溶液相比,场和RR控制应力场下的田间。当初级应力强度因子K-I(P)低于15MPa m(1/2)时,K rr更合适,当K-1(P)超过15MPa m时,HRR-RR更准确。然而,RRSS(在稳态蠕变)值下的RRSS(稳态蠕变)值远高于Fe溶液,但K(弹性应力强度因子K控制应力场的启动)控制值严重低估了发起时间。 HRR(弹性塑料HRR控制应力场下的启动)值低估了载荷水平KIP小于27MPa m(1/2)时的起始时间,但当Ki(P)大于27MPa m时略微高估(1 / 2)。 HRR-RR和HRR溶液非常接近,并且可能在高负荷水平下毫无疑问(K-I(P)& 27MPa m(1/2)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号