首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical Population Biology >Uniform, uninformed or misinformed?: The lingering challenge of minimally informative priors in data-limited Bayesian stock assessments
【24h】

Uniform, uninformed or misinformed?: The lingering challenge of minimally informative priors in data-limited Bayesian stock assessments

机译:统一,不知情或误导?:数据有限贝叶斯股票评估中最小信息前瞻性的挥之不去的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A Bayesian approach to parameter estimation in fisheries stock assessment is often preferred over maximum likelihood estimates, and fisheries management guidelines also sometimes specify that one or the other paradigm be used. However, important issues remain unresolved for the Bayesian approach to stock assessment despite over 25 years of research, development, and application. Here, we explore the consequence of a common practice in Bayesian assessment models: assigning a uniform prior to the logarithm of the parameter representing population scale (log-carrying capacity for biomass-dynamics models, or log-unfished recruits for age-structured models). First, we explain why the value chosen for the upper bound of this prior will affect parameter estimates and fisheries management advice given two properties that are met for many data-poor stock assessment models. Next, we use three case studies and a simulation experiment to show a substantial impact of this decision for data-limited assessments off the US West Coast. We end by discussing four methods for generating an informative prior on the population scale parameter, but conclude that these will not be suitable for many assessments. In these cases, we advocate that maximum likelihood estimation is a simple way to avoid the use of Bayesian priors that are excessively informative.
机译:渔业股票评估中参数估计的贝叶斯估算方法通常是最大似然估计,渔业管理指南有时也指定使用一个或其他范例。然而,尽管研究,开发和应用超过25年,但贝叶斯人的股票评估方法仍未得到解决。在这里,我们探讨了贝叶斯评估模型的常见做法的结果:在代表人口比例的参数的对数之前分配统一(生物量 - 动态模型的对数容量,或用于年龄结构模型的日志通电人员) 。首先,我们解释了为什么选择为此之前的上限所选择的值将影响参数估计和渔业管理建议,给出了许多数据较差的股票评估模型满足的两个属性。接下来,我们使用三种案例研究和模拟实验,对美国西海岸的数据有限评估进行了大量影响。我们通过讨论在人口规模参数之前进行信息的四种方法来结束,但总结说,这些不适合许多评估。在这些情况下,我们提倡最大似然估计是一种简单的方法,避免使用过于信息丰富的贝叶斯女前沿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号