首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >Associative strength or gist extraction: Which matters when DRM lists have two critical lures?
【24h】

Associative strength or gist extraction: Which matters when DRM lists have two critical lures?

机译:联想强度或语写提取:当DRM列表有两个关键诱饵时,这是重要的?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is often used in the study of false memories. This paradigm typically uses lists of words associated with one critical lure. The primary objective of our study was to understand the production of false memories using the DRM paradigm when lists of words are associated with two critical lures. Three experiments were performed, and it was observed that the critical lures associated with the first set were significantly more frequently recalled than the critical lures associated with the second set. This result was verified when the words were presented in descending order of association with the critical lure (Experiment 1), when the words of the second set were presented in ascending order of association with the critical lure (Experiment 2), and when all the words in the list had the same associative strength (Experiment 3). Results are explained by the activation/monitoring and fuzzy-trace theories.
机译:Deese-Roediger-McDermott(DRM)范式通常用于对错误记忆的研究。 该范例通常使用与一个关键诱饵相关的单词列表。 我们研究的主要目标是在单词列表与两个关键诱饵相关时,了解使用DRM范例的错误存储器的生产。 进行三个实验,观察到与第一组相关的临界诱导显着更频繁地召回与第二组相关联的临界诱饵。 当以与关键诱惑(实验1)的关系的降序呈现单词时验证了该结果,当与关键诱饵的关联的升序呈现第二组的单词时,当所有 列表中的单词具有相同的联想强度(实验3)。 结果是通过激活/监测和模糊痕迹理论来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号