首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet infectious diseases >Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 13 delivered as one primary and one booster dose (1?+?1) compared with two primary doses and a booster (2?+?1) in UK infants: a multicentre, parallel group randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 13 delivered as one primary and one booster dose (1?+?1) compared with two primary doses and a booster (2?+?1) in UK infants: a multicentre, parallel group randomised controlled trial

机译:肺炎球菌缀合物疫苗13作为一个初级和一个增强剂量(1?+ 1),与英国婴儿的两个主要剂量和增压器(2?+?1)相比:多期,并行组随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundInfants in the UK were first offered a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in 2006, given at 2 and 4 months of age and a booster dose at 13 months (2?+?1 schedule). A 13-valent vaccine (PCV13) replaced PCV7 in 2010. We aimed to compare the post-booster antibody response in UK infants given a reduced priming schedule of PCV13 (ie, a 1?+?1 schedule) versus the current 2?+?1 schedule and to assess the potential effect on population protection. MethodsIn this multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial, we recuited infants due to receive their primary immunisations aged up to 13 weeks on first vaccinations by information booklets mailed out via the NHS Child Health Information Service and the UK National Health Application and Infrastructure Services. Eligible infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive PCV13 at 2, 4, and 12 months (2?+?1 schedule) or 3 and 12 months of age (1?+?1 schedule) delivered with other routine vaccinations. Randomisation was done by computer-generated permuted block randomisation, with a block size of six. Participants and clinical trial staff were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was serotype-specific immunoglobulin G concentrations values (geometric mean concentrations [GMC] in μg/mL) measured in blood samples collected at 13 months of age. Analysis was by modified intention to treat with all individuals included by randomised group if they had a laboratory result. This trial is registered on the EudraCT clinical trial database, number 2015-000817-32, andClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT02482636. FindingsBetween September, 2015, and June, 2016, 376 infants were assessed for eligibility. 81 infants were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria (n=50) or for other reasons (n=31). 213 eligible infants were enrolled and randomly allocated to group 1 (n=106; 2?+?1 schedule) or to group 2 (n=107; 1?+?1 schedule). In group 1, 91 serum samples were available for analysis 1 month after booster immunisation versus 86 in group 2. At month 13, post-booster, GMCs were equivalent between schedules for serotypes 3 (0·61 μg/mL in group 1vs0·62 μg/mL in group 2), 5 (1·74 μg/mLvs2·11 μg/mL), 7F (3·98 μg/mLvs3·36 μg/mL), 9V (2·34 μg/mLvs2·50 μg/mL), and 19A (8·38 μg/mLvs8·83 μg/mL). Infants given the 1?+?1 schedule had significantly greater immunogenicity post-booster than those given the 2?+?1 schedule for serotypes 1 (8·92 μg/mLvs3·07 μg/mL), 4 (3·43 μg/mLvs2·55 μg/mL), 14 (16·9 μg/mLvs10·49 μg/mL), and 19F (14·76 μg/mLvs11·12 μg/mL; adjusted p value range <0·001 to 0·047). The 2 +?1 schedule was superior for serotypes 6A, 6B, 18C and 23F (adjusted p value range <0·0001 to 0·017). In a predefined numerical subset of all of the infants recruited to the study (n=40 [20%]), functional serotype-specific antibody was similar between schedules. 26 serious adverse events were recorded in 21 (10%) infants across the study period; 18 (n=13) were in the 2?+?1 group and eight (n=8) in the 1?+?1 group. Only one serious adverse event, a high temperature and refusal to feed after the first vaccination visit in a child on the 2+1 schedule was considered related to vaccine. InterpretationOur findings show that for nine of the 13 serotypes in PCV13, post-booster responses in infants primed with a single dose are equivalent or superior to those seen following the standard UK 2 + 1 schedule. Introducing a 1 + 1 schedule in countries with a mature PCV programme and established herd immunity is likely to maintain population control of vaccine-type pneumococcal disease. FundingNIHR and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
机译:英国的背景首先在2006年首次提供了肺炎球菌缀合物疫苗(PCV7),在2和4个月的年龄和13个月(2?+ 1次)的增压剂量。 13价疫苗(PCV13)在2010年替换PCV7。我们旨在比较英国婴儿的后增强后抗体应答,因为PCV13的减少(即1?+?1个时间表)与当前2?+ ?1时间表,并评估对人口保护的潜在影响。方法介绍该多方形,并行组,随机对照试验,我们损坏了婴幼儿,因为通过NHS儿童健康信息服务和英国国家卫生申请和基础设施服务邮寄给第一疫苗,在第一疫苗上获得最多13周的主要免疫。随机分配符合条件的婴儿(1:1),以在2,4和12个月内接收PCV13(2?+?1个时间表),或年龄的3和12个月(1?+?1个时间表),其具有其他常规疫苗接种。随机化通过计算机生成的允许块随机化完成,块大小为六个。与会者和临床试验人员没有掩盖治疗分配。初级终点是血清型免疫球蛋白G浓度值(几何平均浓度[GMC]在13个月的血液样品中测量的血液样品中。通过修改的意图与随机组包括的所有个人进行治疗,如果他们有实验室结果。该试验在Eudract临床试验数据库上注册,2015-000817-32号,andClinicTrials.gov,NumberNCT02482636。 Findingsbetweembers 2015年9月和2016年6月,376名婴儿被评估了资格。 81名婴儿被排除在不符合纳入标准(n = 50)或其他原因(n = 31)。 213符合条件的婴儿被注册并随机分配给第1组(n = 106; 2?+?1个时间表)或第2组(n = 107; 1?+?1时间表)。在第1组中,91种血清样品可用于1个月在增强免疫与86组中分析。在第13期,后助剂后,GMCs在血清型的时间表之间等同于1Vs0·0·62组中的0.·61μg/ ml。第2组中μg/ ml),5(1·74μg/ mLVS2·11μg/ ml),7f(3·98μg/ mlvs3·36μg/ ml),9V(2·34μg/ mLVS2·50μg/ ml)和19a(8·38μg/ mlvs8·83μg/ ml)。给予1?+ 1的婴儿比给出的血清型给出的那些升压后的免疫原性显着更大的免疫原性升压剂1(8·92μg/ mLVS3·07μg/ ml),4(3·43μg/ MLVS2·55μg/ ml),14(16·9μg/ mLVS10·49μg/ ml),和19f(14·76μg/ mlvs11·12μg/ ml;调整后的p值范围<0·001至0·047 )。 2 +α1的时间表优于血清型6a,6b,18c和23f(调节的p值范围<0·0001至0·017)。在招募到该研究的所有婴儿的预定义数值子集中(n = 40 [20%]),在调度之间具有官能血清型抗体。研究期间的21例(10%)婴儿记录了26例严重不良事件; 18(n = 13)在2?+ 1组和八(n = 8)中,在1?+ 1组中。考虑到2 + 1安排的第一次疫苗接种后,只有一个严重的不良事件,高温和拒绝喂养的喂养,被认为是与疫苗有关的。解释试探结果表明,对于PCV13中的13个血清型,婴儿的后助剂反应是等同的或优于标准英国2 + 1时表所见的那些。在具有成熟PCV计划的国家介绍1 + 1个时间表,并确定畜群免疫力可能会保持疫苗型肺炎疫病的人口控制。 FundingNihr和Bill&Melinda Gates基金会。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Lancet infectious diseases》 |2018年第2期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Immunobiology Unit UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health;

    Immunisation Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department Public Health England Colindale;

    Statitstics Modelling and Economics Department Public Health England Colindale;

    Immunobiology Unit UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health;

    Oxford Vaccine Group Department of Paediatrics University of Oxford;

    Immunobiology Unit UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health;

    Oxford Vaccine Group Department of Paediatrics University of Oxford;

    Immunobiology Unit UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health;

    Oxford Vaccine Group Department of Paediatrics University of Oxford;

    Immunobiology Unit UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health;

    Oxford Vaccine Group Department of Paediatrics University of Oxford;

    Immunisation Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department Public Health England Colindale;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 传染病;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号