首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet infectious diseases >Prolonged versus short-term intravenous infusion of antipseudomonal β-lactams for patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
【24h】

Prolonged versus short-term intravenous infusion of antipseudomonal β-lactams for patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

机译:延长与败血症患者的抗癫痫β-内酰胺的短期静脉内输注:随机试验的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Background The findings of randomised controlled trials (RCT), observational studies, and meta-analyses vary regarding the effectiveness of prolonged β-lactam infusion. We aimed to identify the effectiveness of prolonged versus short-term infusion of antipseudomonal β-lactams in patients with sepsis. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare prolonged versus short-term intravenous infusion of antipseudomonal β-lactams in patients with sepsis. Two authors independently searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library of clinical trials until November, 2016, without date or language restrictions. Any RCT comparing mortality or clinical efficacy of prolonged (continuous or ≥3 h) versus short-term (≤60 min) infusion of antipseudomonal β-lactams for the treatment of patients with sepsis was eligible. Studies were excluded if they were not RCTs, the antibiotics in the two arms were not the same, neither mortality nor clinical efficacy was reported, only pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic outcomes were reported, or if ten or fewer patients were enrolled or randomised. Data were extracted in prespecified forms and we then did a meta-analysis using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at any timepoint. This meta-analysis is registered with the PROSPERO database, number CRD42016051678, and is reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Findings 2196 articles were identified and screened, and 22 studies (1876 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool, the quality of evidence for mortality was high. Carbapenems, penicillins, and cephalosporins were studied. Patients with variable age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, severity of sepsis and renal function were enrolled. Prolonged infusion was associated with lower all-cause mortality than short-term infusion (risk ratio [RR] 0·70, 95% CI 0·56–0·87). Heterogeneity was not observed (p=0·93, I 2 =0%). The funnel plot and the Egger's test (p=0·44) showed no evidence of publication bias. Interpretation Prolonged infusion of antipseudomonal β-lactams for the treatment of patients with sepsis was associated with significantly lower mortality than short-term infusion. Further studies in specific subgroups of patients according to age, sepsis severity, degree of renal dysfunction, and immunocompetence are warranted. Funding None.
机译:发明内容背景随机对照试验(RCT),观察性研究和荟萃分析的结果变化了延长β-内酰胺输注的有效性。我们的旨在确定败血症患者延长对抗癫痫β-内酰胺的长期输注的有效性。方法我们做了系统的评价和荟萃分析,以比较败血症患者的慢性静脉β-内酰胺的长期与短期静脉内输注。两位作者独立搜查了PubMed,Scopus和Cochrane库的临床试验,直到2016年11月,没有日期或语言限制。任何RCT比较死亡率或临床疗效的延长(连续或≥3小时)与短期(≤60分钟)输注抗癫痫β-内酰胺,用于治疗败血症患者。如果没有RCT,则排除研究,两只手臂的抗生素不一样,既不报告死亡率也不是临床疗效,只报告了药代动力学或药物动力学结果,或者如果十分之一或更少的患者注册或随机。以预先确定的形式提取数据,然后我们使用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型进行了Meta分析。主要结果是任何时间点的都是导致的死亡率。此元分析在Prospero数据库中注册,编号CRD42016051678,并根据PRISMA指南报告。结果表明和筛选了2196篇文章,并且在荟萃分析中包含22项研究(1876名患者)。根据建议评估,发展和评估工具的评分,死亡率的质量很高。研究了CarbapeNems,青霉素和头孢菌素。可变年龄,急性生理学和慢性健康评估(Apache)II评分,败血症和肾功能严重程度的患者。延长的输注与短期输注较低的全导致死亡率相关(风险比[RR] 0·70,95%CI 0·56-0·87)。未观察到异质性(p = 0·93,I 2 = 0%)。漏斗绘图和Egger的测试(P = 0·44)没有显示出版物偏差的证据。解释延长抗癫痫β-内酰胺治疗脓毒症患者的抗酰胺β-内酰胺与短期输注的死亡率显着降低。需要进一步研究根据年龄,脓毒症严重程度,肾功能障碍程度,肾功能障碍程度和免疫功能性的特定亚组。没有资助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号