...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Academic Librarianship >E-book ILL in Academic Libraries: A Three-Year Trend Report
【24h】

E-book ILL in Academic Libraries: A Three-Year Trend Report

机译:在学术图书馆中的e-book病:一个三年的趋势报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In spite of the widespread trend of e-book adoption by U.S. academic libraries, interlibrary loan (ILL) of e-books is significantly lagging behind because of license agreement restrictions, unstandardized platforms, library policies, and technological barriers. More recently, the long-cherished tradition of ILL has been further challenged, because an increasing number of academic libraries are adopting user-based e-book purchasing models that have the potential to bypass ILL. This paper compares the findings of two longitudinal surveys on e-book ILL practices in U.S. academic libraries, based on random sampling. The results from inferential statistical analyses reveal that, while inter-library lending of entire e-books is seldom practiced and shows no growth, e-book chapter ILL is becoming more prevalent in U.S. academic libraries. Librarians have grown more knowledgeable about licensing and technological issues, but their perceptions of these barriers are mixed. The study also shows that larger institutions are more likely to perform e-book ILL services, and their librarians tend to be more positive about the future of e-book ILL.
机译:尽管美国学术图书馆的电子书采用的广泛趋势,电子书的中限贷款(ILL)由于许可协议限制,未标准的平台,图书馆政策和技术障碍而大幅滞后。最近,生病的漫长传统进一步挑战,因为越来越多的学术图书馆正在采用基于用户的电子书购买模型,这些模型可能绕过生病。本文将基于随机抽样的美国学术图书馆在美国学术图书馆中的两个纵向调查的调查结果。推论统计分析的结果揭示了,虽然整个电子书的图书馆贷款很少实行并显示没有增长,但在美国学术图书馆中,E-Book章节生病变得更加普遍。图书馆员已经增长了解许可和技术问题的知识渊博,但他们对这些障碍的看法是混合的。该研究还表明,较大的机构更有可能执行电子书生病的服务,他们的图书馆员往往对电子书生病的未来更积极。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号