...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Different dietary fibre sources and risks of colorectal cancer and adenoma: a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies
【24h】

Different dietary fibre sources and risks of colorectal cancer and adenoma: a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies

机译:不同的膳食纤维来源和直肠癌和腺瘤的风险:剂量 - 反应荟萃分析前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dietary fibre is believed to provide important health benefits including protection from colorectal cancer. However, the evidence on the relationships with different dietary fibre sources is mixed and little is known about which fibre source provides the greatest benefits. We conducted a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohorts to summarise the relationships of different fibre sources with colorectal cancer and adenoma risks. Analyses were restricted to publications that reported all fibre sources (cereals, vegetables, fruits, legumes) to increase comparability between results. PubMed and Embase were searched through August 2018 to identify relevant studies. The summary relative risks (RR) and 95 % CI were estimated using a random-effects model. This analysis included a total of ten prospective studies. The summary RR of colorectal cancer associated with each 10 g/d increase in fibre intake were 0·91 (95 % CI 0·82, 1·00; I2 = 0 %) for cereal fibre, 0·95 (95 % CI 0·87, 1·03, I2 = 0 %) for vegetable fibre, 0·91 (95 % CI 0·78, 1·06, I2 = 43 %) for fruit fibre and 0·84 (95 % CI 0·63, 1·13, I2 = 45 %) for legume fibre. For cereal fibre, the association with colorectal cancer risk remained statistically significant after adjustment for folate intake (RR 0·89, 95 % CI 0·80, 0·99, I2 = 2 %). For vegetable and fruit fibres, the dose–response curve suggested evidence of non-linearity. All fibre sources were inversely associated with incident adenoma (per 10 g/d increase: RR 0·81 (95 % CI 0·54, 1·21) cereals, 0·84 (95 % CI 0·71, 0·98) for vegetables, 0·78 (95 % CI 0·65, 0·93) for fruits) but not associated with recurrent adenoma. Our data suggest that, although all fibre sources may provide some benefits, the evidence for colorectal cancer prevention is strongest for fibre from cereals/grains.
机译:据信膳食纤维提供了重要的健康益处,包括免受结直肠癌的保护。然而,关于与不同膳食纤维来源的关系的证据混合,并且已知关于哪些纤维源提供最大的益处。我们对预期队列进行了一种剂量 - 反应元分析,总结了不同纤维来源与结直肠癌和腺瘤风险的关系。分析仅限于报告所有纤维来源(谷物,蔬菜,水果,豆类)的出版物,以提高结果之间的可比性。 2018年8月,搜查了PubMed和Embase以确定相关研究。使用随机效应模型估计摘要相对风险(RR)和95%CI。该分析包括共有十项前瞻性研究。与每次10g / d纤维摄入量增加的结肠直肠癌的摘要RR为0·91(95%CI 0·82,1·00; i2 = 0%)用于谷物纤维,0·95(95%CI 0·87,1·03,i2 = 0%)用于植物纤维,0·91(95%CI 0·78,1·06,i2 = 43%)用于水果纤维和0·84(95%CI 0·63,1.1·13,i2 = 45%)用于豆类纤维。对于谷物纤维,与结肠直肠癌风险的关联在叶酸摄入调节后仍然有统计学意义(RR 0·89,95%CI 0·80,0·99,i2 = 2%)。对于蔬菜和水果纤维,剂量 - 反应曲线建议非线性的证据。所有纤维源与入射腺瘤相反(每10g / d增加:RR 0·81(95%CI 0·54,1.1·21)谷物,0·84(95%CI 0·71,0·98)对于蔬菜,水果0·78(95%CI 0·65,0·93),但与复发性腺瘤无关。我们的数据表明,尽管所有光纤来源都可以提供一些好处,但是对谷物/谷物的纤维最强的结肠直肠癌预防的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号