...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Surgery >Long‐term outcomes of endovenous laser ablation and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins
【24h】

Long‐term outcomes of endovenous laser ablation and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins

机译:统治激光烧蚀的长期结果和常规手术的大隐静脉静脉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Clinical guidelines recommend endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) over surgery based on short‐term evidence, yet there are few studies reporting mid‐ to long‐term outcomes. The aim of this study was to report the 5‐year outcomes from an RCT of surgery versus EVLA for treatment of symptomatic great saphenous varicose veins. Methods Patients with symptomatic varicose veins due to great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence were followed up 5?years after enrolment in a randomized trial of either surgery (saphenofemoral junction ligation, GSV strip to the knee and multiple avulsions of varicosities) or EVLA plus multiple avulsions. Outcomes included: clinical recurrence, defined as new varicose veins greater than 3?mm in diameter; Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS); quality of life measured by means of Short Form 36, EuroQol Five Dimensions (EQ‐5D?) and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ); patient satisfaction; and duplex ultrasound examination (DUS) findings. Results Some 218 of the 276 patients enrolled in the trial (79·0 per cent) were available for follow‐up. Clinical recurrence was more frequent following surgery than EVLA at 5?years (34·3 versus 20·9 per cent; P ?=?0·010). Both groups demonstrated sustained significant improvements at 5?years over baseline in VCSS (surgery: median (i.q.r.) 1 (0–2) from 4 (3‐5), P ??0·001; EVLA: 0 (0–1) from 4 (3‐5), P ??0·001), AVVQ (surgery: 4·59 (0·56–9·78) from 13·69 (9·81–18·11), P ??0·001; EVLA: 3·35 (0·17 to 6·55) from 12·73 (9·41–17·32), P ??0·001) and EQ‐5D? (surgery: 1·000 (0·796–1·000) from 0·859 (0·796–1·000), P ?=?0·002; EVLA: 1·000 (0·796–1·000) from 0·808 (0·796–1·000), P ?=?0·002). VCSS was better for EVLA than surgery at 5?years ( P ?=?0·031). Technical success assessed by DUS remained high at 5?years (85·4 per cent for surgery and 93·2 per cent for EVLA; P ?=?0·074). DUS‐detected anatomical patterns of recurrence differed between the groups. Conclusion EVLA was more effective than surgery in preventing clinical recurrence 5?years after treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. Patient‐reported outcome measures were similar. Registration number: NCT00759434 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).
机译:背景技术临床指南推荐基于短期证据的忠诚激光烧蚀(EVLA)过度手术,但很少有研究报告中期的长期结果。本研究的目的是报告来自手术RCT的5年结果与EVLA治疗症状伟大的隐静脉静脉。方法对症状静脉(GSV)症状静脉患者的患者在任何手术(Saphenoforal结扎结扎,GSV条带到膝关节的随机试验中,入学后5岁以下撕裂。结果包括:临床复发,定义为直径大于3Ωmm的新静脉曲张;静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS);通过简短的形式测量的生活质量,欧元季度五维(EQ-5D?)和Aberdeen varicose vein调查表(avvq);患者满意度;和双工超声检查(DUS)调查结果。结果276名患者中有大约218名入学患者(79·0%)可供随访。临床复发在手术后比evla在5?年(34·3与20·9%; p?= 0·010)。两组在VCSS中的基线(手术:中位数(IQR)1(0-2),从4(3-5),P≥1; 0·001; EVLA:0(0- 1)从4(3-5),p?&?0·001),avvq(手术:4·59(0·56-9·78)从13·69(9·81-18·11), p?& 0·001; EVLA:3·35(0·17至6·55),从12·73(9·41-17·32),p?<0·001)和EQ-5D还(手术:1·000(0·796-1 000)从0·859(0·796-1 000),p?= 0·002; EVLA:1 000(0·796-1 000 )从0·808(0·796-1 000),p?=?0·002)。 VCSS在5岁时对EVLA更好?年龄(P?= 0·031)。 DUS评估的技术成功在5岁以下(85·4%的手术,93·2%的EVLA; P?= 0·074)。 DUS检测到的复发性的解剖模式不同于组之间。结论Evla比在治疗大隐静脉静脉后预防临床复发5的手术更有效。患者报告的结果措施相似。注册号:NCT00759434(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The British Journal of Surgery》 |2018年第13期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Academic Vascular Surgical UnitHull York Medical SchoolHull UK;

    Academic Vascular Surgical UnitHull York Medical SchoolHull UK;

    Academic Vascular Surgical UnitHull York Medical SchoolHull UK;

    Academic Vascular Surgical UnitHull York Medical SchoolHull UK;

    Academic Vascular Surgical UnitHull York Medical SchoolHull UK;

    Academic Vascular Surgical UnitHull York Medical SchoolHull UK;

    Academic Vascular Surgical UnitHull York Medical SchoolHull UK;

    Academic Vascular Surgical UnitHull York Medical SchoolHull UK;

    Academic Vascular Surgical UnitHull York Medical SchoolHull UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 外科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号