...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychopathology >Anomalous Self-Experiences: Markers of Schizophrenia Vulnerability or Symptoms of Depersonalization Disorder? A Phenomenological Investigation of Two Cases
【24h】

Anomalous Self-Experiences: Markers of Schizophrenia Vulnerability or Symptoms of Depersonalization Disorder? A Phenomenological Investigation of Two Cases

机译:异常自我体验:精神分裂症脆弱性的标志物或缺口中的疾病症状? 两种情况的现象学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Basic self-disturbance (BSD) is proposed to constitute the clinical core of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, including prodromal states and schizotypy. Anomalous self-experiences (ASEs) are suggested as phenotypic variants of BSD, representing markers of schizophrenia vulnerability. However, ASEs are not restricted to the schizophrenia spectrum, but may also occur in non-psychotic states like depersonalization disorder (DPD). It is unclear to what extent the prevalence and nature of ASEs are differing between the two conditions. The main aim of this paper is to assess and compare ASEs in both conditions, based on literature and two illustrating cases. This might expand the understanding of these phenomena, and strengthen the basis for clinical differentiation. Methods: One patient with schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) and one with DPD were selected from an ongoing clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis study. ASEs were assessed with the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE) and analyzed according to the two central dimensions of BSD: diminished self-affection and hyperreflexivity, as well as according to prototypical aspects of depersonalization. The cases were also analyzed and compared with respect to chronology, other symptomatology, and psychopathological pathways. Results: Both cases revealed ASEs reflecting the central dimensions of BSD as well as prototypical aspects of depersonalization. Only the SPD case however, linked ASEs to psychotic-like ideas of external influence and control. The symptoms had an insidious early childhood onset with no obvious triggers in the SPD case, and an abrupt adolescence onset triggered by second-time cannabis use and panic anxiety in the DPD case. Conclusions: The similarities and differences in ASEs, symptomatology and developmental pathways of the two cases might be accounted for by an updated model of self-disorders. The model proposes that schizophrenia manifests as a result of a combination of early "primary"-onset ASEs, reflecting disturbances in early neurodevelopment, and later occurring, "secondary" ASEs of a more defensive-protective character. In line with this, the DPD case may be characterized only by secondary ASEs and thus better protected against psychotic decompensation than the SPD case, tentatively affected by a combination of primary and secondary ASEs. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:提出基本的自我扰动(BSD)构成精神分裂症谱系疾病的临床核心,包括前驱症和酶酶。异常的自我经验(ASES)被建议作为BSD的表型变体,代表精神分裂症脆弱性的标志物。然而,ASES不限于精神分裂症谱,但也可能发生在非精神病状态,如依托和解障碍(DPD)。目前尚不清楚两个条件之间的患病率和性质在多大程度上不同。本文的主要目的是根据文献和两个说明病例评估和比较两种情况的ases。这可能会扩大对这些现象的理解,并加强临床分化的基础。方法:从持续的临床高风险(CHR)中选择一个患有斯科匹术人格障碍(SPD)和DPD的患者进行精神病研究。通过检查异常自我经验(易于)并根据BSD的两个中心尺寸进行分析,分析:自我影响和超粗曲线,以及根据缺席化的原型方面。还分析了该病例,并与年表,其他症状学和精神病理学途径进行了分析。结果:这两种情况都揭示了反映了BSD的中心尺寸的原样,以及代谢化的原型方面。然而,只有SPD案例,与外部影响和控制的精神病的思想相连。症状有一个阴险的早期儿童发病,在SPD案件中没有明显的触发,并且在DPD案例中的二次大麻使用和恐慌焦虑突然触发了突然的青春期发作。结论:通过更新的自我障碍模型,可能会占原因,症状和发展途径的相似性和差异。该模型提出了精神分裂症表现出早期“初级” - 中央的组合,反映早期神经发育的干扰,后来发生的“继发”的诸如更防御性保护性质的“二次”。符合这一点,DPD案例可以仅由次级应用表征,从而更好地保护比SPD案例更强地保护精神病案,暂时受到初级和次级的组合影响。 (c)2018年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号