AbstractThis study aimed to find out whether the microstructural approach of schema theory (MICAST) ca'/> A Schematic Analysis of Three Genres in the Light of Flow Theory and Optimal Experience
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Studies >A Schematic Analysis of Three Genres in the Light of Flow Theory and Optimal Experience
【24h】

A Schematic Analysis of Three Genres in the Light of Flow Theory and Optimal Experience

机译:流动理论鉴定三种类型的示意性分析和最佳体验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AbstractThis study aimed to find out whether the microstructural approach of schema theory (MICAST) can be employed to evaluate the reading passages of textbooks. To this end, the macrostructural approach of schema theory (MACAST) was utilized to assign twelve passages of a textbook taught at the upper intermediate level of language proficiency to descriptive, expository and narrative rhetorical modes generally knows as genres. All the words constituting the passages were then treated as schema tokens and assigned to their linguistic domains, genera, and species as suggested by the MICAST. Subjecting the tokens constituting the three genres to statistical analyses showed that the genres differed significantly from each other. They did not, however, differ significantly in the number of passive schema tokens they contained. The descriptive, narrative and expository genres did also differ significantly from each other when their constituting schema tokens were reduced to exclusive schema types. The administration of a flow perception questionnaire to the readers of the passages showed that among the genres, the descriptive one induces flow the most because its exclusive semantic, syntactic and parasyntactic schema types were significantly fewer than those of narrative and expository genres. The pedagogical implications of the findings in the realm of English language teaching are brought up.]]>
机译:<![CDATA [<摘要ID =“ABS1”语言=“EN”OUTPORMEDIUM =“全部”> <标题>抽象 本研究旨在了解是否了解的微观结构方法模式理论(Micast)可以用于评估教科书的阅读通道。为此,使用模式理论(MACAST)的宏观结构方法用于分配在语言熟练程度的上级中间水平的教科书的十二段段落,以描述性,陈述和叙事修辞模式通常都知道作为类型。然后,构成通道的所有单词被视为模式令牌,并分配给MICAST建议的语言域,属和物种。使构成三种类型的令牌对统计分析进行表明,族族彼此显着不同。然而,他们没有在它们所含的被动模式令牌的数量中显着差异。当构成的模式令牌减少到独家架构类型时,描述性,叙述和关联类型的描述性彼此显着不同。将流动感知问卷调查给通道的读者显示,在流派中,描述性的一个诱导流动最多,因为它的独家语义,句法和副交联模式类型显着少于叙事和关联类型。提出了英语语言教学领域的研究结果的教学意义。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号