首页> 外文期刊>Psychological research >On the importance of considering heterogeneity in witnesses' competence levels when reconstructing crimes from multiple witness testimonies
【24h】

On the importance of considering heterogeneity in witnesses' competence levels when reconstructing crimes from multiple witness testimonies

机译:关于在重建多个人证人证词的犯罪时考虑证人能力水平异质性的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aggregating information across multiple testimonies may improve crime reconstructions. However, different aggregation methods are available, and research on which method is best suited for aggregating multiple observations is lacking. Furthermore, little is known about how variance in the accuracy of individual testimonies impacts the performance of competing aggregation procedures. We investigated the superiority of aggregation-based crime reconstructions involving multiple individual testimonies and whether this superiority varied as a function of the number of witnesses and the degree of heterogeneity in witnesses' ability to accurately report their observations. Moreover, we examined whether heterogeneity in competence levels differentially affected the relative accuracy of two aggregation procedures: a simple majority rule, which ignores individual differences, and the more complex general Condorcet model (Romney et al., Am Anthropol 88(2):313-338, 1986; Batchelder and Romney, Psychometrika 53(1):71-92, 1988), which takes into account differences in competence between individuals. 121 participants viewed a simulated crime and subsequently answered 128 true/false questions about the crime. We experimentally generated groups of witnesses with homogeneous or heterogeneous competences. Both the majority rule and the general Condorcet model provided more accurate reconstructions of the observed crime than individual testimonies. The superiority of aggregated crime reconstructions involving multiple individual testimonies increased with an increasing number of witnesses. Crime reconstructions were most accurate when competences were heterogeneous and aggregation was based on the general Condorcet model. We argue that a formal aggregation should be considered more often when eyewitness testimonies have to be assessed and that the general Condorcet model provides a good framework for such aggregations.
机译:跨多个证词的聚合信息可以改善犯罪重建。然而,可以使用不同的聚合方法,并且缺乏对哪种方法最适合聚集多种观察的研究。此外,关于如何对个人证词的准确性的方差影响竞争聚合程序的性能的差异很少。我们调查了涉及多个个体证词的基于聚合的犯罪重建的优越性,以及这种优势是否随着证人的数量和证人准确报告其观察的能力的异质程度而变化。此外,我们检查了能力水平的异质性是否差异地影响了两个聚合程序的相对准确性:一个简单的多数规则,忽略了个体差异,以及更复杂的通用髁架模型(Romney等,AM Anthopol 88(2):313 -338,1986; Batchelder和Romney,Psyscometrika 53(1):71-92,1988),考虑到个人之间的能力差异。 121名参与者查看了一个模拟犯罪,随后回答了关于犯罪的128个真正/错误的问题。我们通过同质或异质竞争力进行了实验生成了证人的群体。大多数规则和一般的Condorcet模型都提供了比个人证词更准确地重建观察到的犯罪。涉及多个单独的证词的聚合犯罪重建的优越性随着越来越多的证人而增加。当能力是异质和聚合时,犯罪重建最准确,并且基于一般的髁架模型。我们争辩说,当必须评估目击者证词时,应更常常审议正式的聚合,并且一般的Condorcet模型为此类聚集提供了良好的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号