...
首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Emergency Medical Services Bypass of the Closest Facility for Pediatric Patients
【24h】

Emergency Medical Services Bypass of the Closest Facility for Pediatric Patients

机译:紧急医疗服务绕过儿科患者最近的设施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Pediatric specialty care is increasingly regionalized. It is unknown how regionalization affects emergency medical services (EMS) providers' destination decisions for non-trauma pediatric patients. We sought to characterize the rates of bypass of the closest facility, and destination facilities' levels of pediatric care in three diverse EMS agencies. Methods: This is a one-year retrospective study of non-trauma pediatric patients less than 18 years of age transported by three EMS agencies (Baltimore City, Prince George's County, and Queen Anne's County) in 2016. A priori, a bypass was defined as transport to a facility more than 2 km farther than the distance to the closest facility. We calculated rates of bypass and categorized destination and closest facilities by their pediatric service availability using publicly available information. EMS transport distance and time were also compared for bypass and closest facility patients. Results: The three EMS agencies in 2016 transported a total of 12,258 non-trauma pediatric patients, of whom 11,945 (97%) were successfully geocoded. Overall 43% (n = 5,087) of patients bypassed the nearest facility, of which 87% (n = 4,439) were transported to a facility with higher-level pediatric care than the closest facility. Both bypass rates and destination facility pediatric levels differed between agencies. Bypasses had significantly longer transport times and distances as compared to closest facility transports (p < 0.001). For non-trauma pediatric bypasses alone, an additional 41,494 kilometers traveled, and 979 hours of EMS transport time was attributable to bypassing the closest facility. Conclusions: This study reveals a high rate of pediatric bypass for non-trauma patients in three diverse EMS agencies. Bypass results in increased EMS resource utilization through longer transport time and distance. For non-trauma pediatric patients for whom there is little destination guidance, further work is required to determine bypass' effects on patient outcomes.
机译:目的:儿科专业越来越多地区。若干区域化如何影响非创伤儿科患者的紧急医疗服务(EMS)的目的地决策。我们试图在三种不同的EMS机构中表征最近的设施和目的地设施的旁路率和目的地设施的水平。方法:这是2016年由三个EMS机构(巴尔的摩市,乔治郡王子县王子县)运输的非创伤儿科患者的一年重点研究,不到18岁。在2016年,绕过绕过旁路作为运输到设施超过2米的设施比到最近的设施的距离更远。我们使用公开信息的信息计算旁路和分类目的地和最近的设施的速率。除旁路和最近的设施患者也比较EMS运输距离和时间。结果:2016年的三个EMS机构共送出12,258名非创伤性儿科患者,其中11,945名(97%)成功地理编码。总共43%(n = 5,087)患者绕过最近的设施,其中87%(n = 4,439)被运送到具有更高级别的儿科护理的设施,而不是最接近的设施。旁路率和目的地设施儿科水平都有所不同。与最近的设施运输相比,旁路具有明显更长的运输时间和距离(P <0.001)。对于单独的非创伤儿科旁路,行驶的41,494公里,979小时的EMS运输时间是占地的最接近的设施。结论:本研究揭示了三种多元化EMS机构中非创伤患者的小儿小儿旁路率高。旁路通过更长的运输时间和距离导致EMS资源利用增加。对于没有目的地指导的非创伤儿科患者,需要进一步的工作来确定对患者结果的绕过效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号