...
首页> 外文期刊>PharmacoEconomics >Cost Effectiveness of Support for People Starting a New Medication for a Long-Term Condition Through Community Pharmacies: An Economic Evaluation of the New Medicine Service (NMS) Compared with Normal Practice
【24h】

Cost Effectiveness of Support for People Starting a New Medication for a Long-Term Condition Through Community Pharmacies: An Economic Evaluation of the New Medicine Service (NMS) Compared with Normal Practice

机译:通过社区药典开始支持新药物的人们支持新药物的成本有效性:与正常实践相比,新药服务(NMS)的经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background The English community pharmacy New Medicine Service (NMS) significantly increases patient adherence to medicines, compared with normal practice. We examined the cost effectiveness of NMS compared with normal practice by combining adherence improvement and intervention costs with the effect of increased adherence on patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Methods We developed Markov models for diseases targeted by the NMS (hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and antiplatelet regimens) to assess the impact of patients’ non-adherence. Clinical event probability, treatment pathway, resource use and costs were extracted from literature and costing tariffs. Incremental costs and outcomes associated with each disease were incorporated additively into a composite probabilistic model and combined with adherence rates and intervention costs from the trial. Costs per extra quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) were calculated from the perspective of NHS England, using a lifetime horizon. Results NMS generated a mean of 0.05 (95% CI 0.00–0.13) more QALYs per patient, at a mean reduced cost of ?£144 (95% CI ?769 to 73). The NMS dominates normal practice with a probability of 0.78 [incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) ?£3166 per QALY]. NMS has a 96.7% probability of cost effectiveness compared with normal practice at a willingness to pay of £20,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that targeting each disease with NMS has a probability over 0.90 of cost effectiveness compared with normal practice at a willingness to pay of £20,000 per QALY. Conclusions Our study suggests that the NMS increased patient medicine adherence compared with normal practice, which translated into increased health gain at reduced overall cost. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Trial reference number NCT01635361 ( http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01635361 ). Current Controlled trials: Trial reference number ISRCTN 23560818 ( http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN23560818/ ; DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN23560818 ). UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN) study 12494 ( http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/Search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=12494 ). Funding Department of Health Policy Research Programme.
机译:摘要背景,英国社区药房新医学服务(NMS)与正常实践相比,患者对药品的粘附性显着增加。通过将依从性提升和干预成本与增加的患者结果和医疗保健成本相结合,我们研究了NMS的成本效益与正常实践相比。方法开发了NMS(高血压,2型糖尿病,慢性阻塞性肺病,哮喘和抗血小板)针对的疾病的Markov模型,以评估患者不遵守的影响。临床事件概率,治疗途径,资源利用和成本从文献和成本核算的关税中提取。与每种疾病相关的增量成本和结果恰当地纳入复合概率模型,并与试验中的遵守率和干预成本结合在一起。使用寿命范围的NHS英格兰的角度来计算每个超额质量调整的生命年份(QALY)的成本。结果NMS产生的平均值为0.05(95%CI 0.00-0.13),每个患者的Qalys,平均值降低成本?£144(95%CI?769至73)。 NMS主导了正常实践,概率为0.78 [增量成本效益率(ICER)?每QALY 3166英镑]。 NMS具有96.7%的成本效益概率与正常实践相比,愿意支付每qaly 20,000英镑。敏感性分析证明,与NMS的每种疾病靶向成本效益的概率超过0.90,而与正常实践达到每QALY的愿意支付20,000英镑。结论我们的研究表明,与正常实践相比,NMS增加了患者药物依从性,这转化为减少总成本的健康收益。试验登记ClinicalTrials.gov试用参考编号NCT01635361(http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/nct01635361)。当前对照试验:试验参考编号ISRCTN 23560818(http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn23560818/; doi 10.1186 / ISRCTN23560818)。英国临床研究网络(UKCRN)研究12494(http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/studydetail.aspx?studyid=12494)。卫生政策研究计划的资助部。

著录项

  • 来源
    《PharmacoEconomics》 |2017年第12期|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Manchester Centre for Health Economics Room 4.318 4th floor Jean Mcfarlane Building Division of;

    Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy The School of Pharmacy University of Nottingham;

    Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy The School of Pharmacy University of Nottingham;

    Primary Care Research Division of Primary Care School of Medicine Queen’s Medical Centre;

    Emeritus Professor of Pharmacy UCL School of Pharmacy;

    Research Design Service East Midlands (RDS EM) School of Medicine Queen’s Medical Centre;

    Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy The School of Pharmacy University of Nottingham;

    School of Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Queen’s Medical Centre;

    Patient and Public Representative;

    Organisational Sociology and Improvement Science Centre for Health Innovation Leadership and;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 药学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号