...
首页> 外文期刊>Photodermatology, photoimmunology and photomedicine >Clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy and laser irradiation as an adjunct to open flap debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy and laser irradiation as an adjunct to open flap debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:光动力治疗和激光辐照作为开放式牙动清代术治疗慢性牙周炎的临床疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The aim of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to assess the quality of evidence and efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) and laser irradiation (LI) as an adjunct to open flap debridement (OFD) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. Methods Electronic searches were conducted in databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register databases) up to March 2019. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing clinical efficacy of either aPDT and/or LI, placebo, or no treatment were included. Primary outcomes included clinical attachment level (CAL), while secondary outcomes were reduction in probing depth (PD) and gingival recession (GR) depth. The weighted mean differences (WMD) of outcomes and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each variable were calculated using random effect model. Results Six RCTs were included. For aPDT studies, the overall mean difference for CAL gain (WMD = -0.61, 95% CI = -1.22 to -0.016, P = .044) and PD reduction (WMD = -1.79, 95% CI = -3.44 to -0.14, P = .034) was significant between aPDT and OFD groups at follow-up. No significant overall mean difference was observed for GR depth (WMD = 0.02, 95% CI = -0.75 to 0.79, P = .95). For LI studies, none of the clinical periodontal parameters including CAL gain (WMD = 0.23, 95% CI = -0.09 to 0.55, P = .159, Figure 3A), PD reduction (WMD = 0.31, 95% CI = -0.67 to 1.31, P = .52, Figure 3B) and GR depth (WMD = -0.34, 95% CI = -2.47 to 1.78, P = .74, Figure 3C) were found to be significant between LI and OFD groups at follow-up. Conclusion With the limited data available, only aPDT as an adjunct to OFD showed superior results for clinical periodontal parameters compared to OFD alone in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. Further RCTs are warranted in order to obtain robust conclusions with regard to laser therapy.
机译:背景技术该系统审查和荟萃分析的目的是评估抗菌光动力治疗(APDT)和激光辐射(LI)作为开放瓣膜清除(OFD)治疗慢性牙周炎的辅助效果的证据和功效的质量。方法在2019年3月,在数据库中进行电子搜索(Medline,Embase,Cochrane中央注册登记册数据库)在数据库中进行,可随机临床试验(RCT)比较APDT和/或LI,安慰剂的临床疗效,或没有包括治疗。主要结果包括临床附着水平(CAL),而二次结果在探测深度(PD)和牙龈衰退(GR)深度降低。使用随机效应模型计算每个变量的结果和95%置信区间(CI)的加权平均差异(CI)。结果包括六个RCT。对于APDT研究,CAL增益(WMD = -0.61,95%CI = -1.22至-0.016,P = .044)和PD减少(WMD = -1.79,95%CI = -3.44至-0.14至-0.14至-0.14 ,P = .034)APDT和OFD组在随访中的显着性。对于GR深度(WMD = 0.02,95%CI = -0.75至0.79,P = .95),没有观察到显着的总体平均差异。对于李研究,临床牙周参数均无CAL增益(WMD = 0.23,95%CI = -0.09至0.55,P = .159,图3A),PD减少(WMD = 0.31,95%CI = -0.67 1.31,P = .52,图3b)和GR深度(WMD = -0.34,95%CI = -2.47至1.78,p = .74,图3c)在后续行动中的李和欧姆特组之间是显着的。结论具有有限的数据,只有APDT作为OFD的辅助表现出较好的临床牙周参数结果,与OFD在治疗慢性牙周炎中相比。有必要进一步的RCT,以便在激光治疗方面获得强大的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号