...
首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Can obstetric complications explain the high levels of obstetric interventions and maternity service use among older women? A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data.
【24h】

Can obstetric complications explain the high levels of obstetric interventions and maternity service use among older women? A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data.

机译:产科并发症是否可以解释老年妇女高水平的产科干预措施和产妇服务?对常规收集数据的回顾性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the higher levels of obstetric intervention and maternity service use among older women can be explained by obstetric complications. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data from the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank. PARTICIPANTS: All residents of Aberdeen city district delivering singleton infants at the Maternity Hospital 1988-1997 (28,484 deliveries). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios for each intervention in older maternal age groups compared with women aged 20-29. Interventions considered include obstetric interventions (induction of labour, augmentation, epidural use, assisted delivery, caesarean section) and raised maternity service use (more than two prenatal scans, amniocentesis, antenatal admission to hospital, admission at delivery of more than five days, infant resuscitation, and admission to the neonatal unit). METHODS: Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between maternal age and the incidence of interventions. The odds ratios for each intervention were then adjusted for relevant obstetric complications and maternal socio-demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Levels of amniocentesis, caesarean section, assisted delivery, induction, and augmentation (in primiparae) are all higher among older women. Maternity service use also increases significantly with age: older women are more likely to have an antenatal admission, more than two scans, a hospital stay at delivery of more than five days, and have their baby admitted to a neonatal unit. Controlling for relevant obstetric complications reveals several examples of effect modification, but does not eliminate the age effect for most interventions in most groups of women. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of intervention among older women are not explained by the obstetric complications we considered.
机译:目的:确定是否可以通过产科并发症来解释老年妇女较高的产科干预和产妇服务水平。设计:回顾性分析来自阿伯丁孕妇和新生儿数据库的常规数据。参加者:1988-1997年,阿伯丁市区所有住院分娩的单胎婴儿(分娩28484例)。主要观察指标:与20-29岁的女性相比,老年产妇中每种干预的几率。考虑的干预措施包括产科干预措施(引产,扩大,硬膜外使用,辅助分娩,剖腹产)和提高产妇使用率(两次以上产前检查,羊膜穿刺术,产前入院,分娩五天以上入院,婴儿复苏,并进入新生儿科)。方法:采用逻辑回归分析研究孕妇年龄与干预发生率之间的关系。然后针对相关的产科并发症和孕产妇的社会人口统计学特征,对每种干预措施的优势比进行调整。结果:老年妇女的羊膜穿刺术,剖腹产,辅助分娩,引产和增强(初产妇)水平较高。产妇服务的使用也随着年龄的增长而显着增加:老年妇女更可能接受产前检查,两次以上的检查,分娩时间超过五天的住院时间以及将婴儿送入新生儿病房。控制相关的产科并发症揭示了几种改善效果的例子,但并不能消除大多数妇女群体中大多数干预措施的年龄影响。结论:我们所考虑的产科并发症并不能解释老年妇女中较高的干预水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号