...
首页> 外文期刊>Sports health >Influence of Body Position on Shoulder and Trunk Muscle Activation During Resisted Isometric Shoulder External Rotation
【24h】

Influence of Body Position on Shoulder and Trunk Muscle Activation During Resisted Isometric Shoulder External Rotation

机译:抵抗等距外旋转肩部肩部肩部肌肉激活的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: External rotation (ER) strengthening of the shoulder is an integral component of rehabilitative and preventative programs for overhead athletes. A variety of shoulder ER strengthening exercises are reported, including those intended to integrate the core musculature. The purpose of this study was to examine ER torque and electromyographic (EMG) activation of shoulder and trunk muscles while performing resisted isometric shoulder ER in 3 positions (standing, side lying, and side plank). Hypothesis: Significantly greater force and shoulder muscle activation would be generated while side lying given the inherent stability of the position, and greater trunk muscle activation would be generated in the less stable plank position. Study Design: Quasi-experimental repeated-measures study. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Methods: A convenience sample of 25 healthy overhead recreational athletes (9 men, 16 women) participated in this study. EMG electrodes were placed on the infraspinatus, posterior deltoid, middle trapezius, multifidi, internal obliques, and external obliques. EMG signals were normalized to a maximal isometric contraction. Participants performed resisted isometric ER in standing, side-lying, and side plank positions. Results were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni corrections (α = 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference in ER torque between positions (α = 0.05). A significant difference in EMG activity of shoulder and trunk musculature between positions was found in 7 of the 8 muscles monitored. Significantly greater EMG activity in the infraspinatus, middle trapezius, and the nondominant external and internal obliques was found in the side plank position as compared with standing and side lying. Conclusion: While there was no difference in ER torque between the 3 exercise positions, EMG activity of the shoulder and trunk muscles was dependent on body position. Clinical Relevance: If a clinician is seeking to integrate trunk muscle activation while performing shoulder ER strengthening, the side plank position is preferred as compared with standing or side lying.
机译:背景:外部旋转(ER)加强肩部是用于顶置运动员的康复和预防计划的组成部分。报告了各种肩部加强练习,包括旨在整合核心肌肉组织的人。本研究的目的是检查肩部和躯干肌肉的ER扭矩和电拍摄(EMG)激活,同时在3个位置进行抵抗等距肩部ER(侧侧,侧侧板)。假设:在鉴于位置的固有稳定性的侧面侧侧侧的侧面产生显着更大的力和肩部肌肉激活,并且在较低的稳定性板位置产生更大的躯干肌肉激活。研究设计:准实验重复措施研究。证据级别:级别5.方法:25个健康的高架休闲运动员(9名男子,16名女性)的便利样本参加了这项研究。将EMG电极置于Infraspinatus,后倾曲线,中间梯形,多样性,内倾斜和外倾斜。 EMG信号被标准化为最大的等距收缩。参与者在站立,侧面躺着和侧板位置执行抵抗等距ER。使用重复措施分析与后HOC Bonferroni校正的差异分析(α= 0.05)进行分析结果。结果:位置之间的ER扭矩没有显着差异(α= 0.05)。在监测的8个肌肉中的7个中发现了肩部肩部和躯干肌肉和躯干肌肉组织的EMG活性的显着差异。与站立和侧躺线相比,在侧板位置中发现了在抗腹下肌中,中间梯度和内部斜肌中的显着更大的EMG活性。结论:虽然3个运动位置之间的ER扭矩没有差异,但肩部和躯干肌肉的EMG活性取决于身体位置。临床相关性:如果临床医生正在寻求整合躯干肌肉激活,同时执行肩部ER强化,与站立或侧面躺着相比,侧板位置是优选的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Sports health》 |2018年第4期|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Mayo Clinic Program in Physical Therapy Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester Minnesota;

    Mayo Clinic Program in Physical Therapy Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester Minnesota;

    Mayo Clinic Program in Physical Therapy Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester Minnesota;

    Mayo Clinic Program in Physical Therapy Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester Minnesota;

    Mayo Clinic Program in Physical Therapy Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester Minnesota;

    Mayo Clinic Program in Physical Therapy Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester Minnesota;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 运动医学;
  • 关键词

    electromyography; shoulder; strengthening;

    机译:肌电图;肩部;加强;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号