首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. >Prevalence and predictors of dropout from high‐intensity interval training in sedentary individuals: A meta‐analysis
【24h】

Prevalence and predictors of dropout from high‐intensity interval training in sedentary individuals: A meta‐analysis

机译:高强度间隔训练中辍学辍学的患病率和预测因子:荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent evidence suggests that high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) is an effective method to improve fitness and various health markers. However, the tolerability and acceptability of HIIT among sedentary individuals is currently controversially discussed. Therefore, our objective was to investigate the prevalence and predictors of dropout among sedentary individuals in HIIT‐based exercise interventions. MEDLINE/PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched systematically for relevant articles until 06/2018. Studies included were required to (a) be written in English, (b) include sedentary healthy adults, (c) use some form of HIIT without any complementary intervention, (d) last ≥4?weeks, (e) report detailed description of the applied HIIT protocol, and (f) report data that allow calculation of a dropout rate. Fifty‐five studies reporting results from 67 HIIT interventions with 1318 participants met the eligibility criteria. The trim and fill adjusted pooled dropout rate across all interventions was 17.6% (95% confidence interval 14.2‐21.5%). Dropout rates were significantly lower in cycling‐based interventions compared with studies using running/walking as exercise modality ( P? ?0.001). Longer session time ( β ?=?0.02, P? ?0.05), higher time effort/week ( β ?=?0.005, P? ?0.05), and overall time effort/intervention ( β ?=?0.0003, P? ?0.05) predicted greater dropout. Exercise intensity was not related to dropout. Our data suggest that HIIT‐based interventions are tolerable and acceptable for previously sedentary individuals, exhibiting generally lower dropout rates than commonly reported for traditional exercise programs. Given the association between HIIT volume and dropouts, future studies should further focus on identifying the minimally effective dose of practical HIIT for improving health status. Such efforts would be important to increase implementation and public health impact of HIIT.
机译:最近的证据表明,高强度间隔训练(HIIT)是改善健身和各种健康标记的有效方法。然而,久坐人类在久坐的人中的耐受性和可接受性目前讨论过。因此,我们的目标是探讨高度的运动干预中久坐的人中止动女辍学的普遍和预测因素。在系统地寻找Medline / PubMed,Sportdiscus和Sporess Web,直到06/2018。包括的研究是必需的(a)用英文写作,(b)包括久坐不动健康成人,(c)使用某种形式的高素质,没有任何互补的干预,(d)持续≥4周,(e)报告详细说明应用的HIIT协议,(f)报告数据,允许计算辍学率。五十五项研究报告结果来自67名与1318名参与者的高利兹干预措施达到了资格标准。所有干预措施的修剪和填充调整后汇集速度为17.6%(95%置信区间14.2-21.5%)。与使用运行/步行作为运动方式的研究相比,基于循环的干预率的放大率显着降低(P?<0.001)。更长的会话时间(β?= 0.02,p≤0.05),较高的时间努力/周(β?= 0.005,p≤0.05),以及总时间努力/干预(β?= 0.0003 ,p?&?0.05)预测更大的辍学。运动强度与辍学无关。我们的数据表明,基于HIIT的干预措施可容忍和可接受的以前久坐的人,展示通常较低的辍学率,而不是普通报告的传统运动计划。鉴于高等体积和辍学之间的关联,未来的研究将进一步专注于确定用于改善健康状况的最小有效剂量的实用高素质。这种努力对提高高利兹的实施和公共卫生影响是重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号