【24h】

Sex-based Differences in Hearing Loss: Perspectives From Non-clinical Research to Clinical Outcomess

机译:性感损失的性别差异:从临床改造的非临床研究的视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: It is estimated over 466 million people worldwide have disabling hearing loss, and untreated hearing loss is associated with poorer health outcomes. The influence of sex as a biological variable on hearing loss is not well understood, especially for differences in underlying mechanisms which are typically elucidated through non-clinical research. Although the inclusion of sex as a biological variable in clinical studies has been required since 1993, sex reporting has only been recently mandated in National Institutes of Health funded non-clinical studies. Objective: This article reviews the literature on recent non-clinical and clinical research concerning sex-based differences in hearing loss primarily since 1993, and discusses implications for knowledge gaps in the translation from non-clinical to clinical realms. Conclusions: The disparity between sex-based requirements for non-clinical versus clinical research may inhibit a comprehensive understanding of sex-based mechanistic differences. Such disparities may play a role in understanding and explaining clinically significant sex differences and are likely necessary for developing robust clinical treatment options.
机译:简介:估计全球466万人有禁用听力损失,未经治疗的听力损失与较差的保健结果有关。性别作为听力损失的生物变量的影响尚不清楚,特别是对于通常通过非临床研究阐明的潜在机制的差异。虽然自1993年以来一直需要将性作为临床研究中的生物变量纳入性别,但最近在国家卫生机构资助的非临床研究中均获得性报告。目的:本文综述了近期非临床和临床研究的文献,涉及自1993年以来的性交损失的性别差异,并探讨了对临床临床境界翻译中知识间隙的影响。结论:非临床与临床研究的性别依据之间的差异可能会抑制对基于性的机械差异的全面了解。这种差异可能在理解和解释临床上显着的性差异并且可能是制定强大的临床治疗方案所必需的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号