首页> 外文期刊>Raumforschung und Raumordnung >To the Gap Between Theory-based Planning Research and Planning Practice. An Examination of Large Parts of the German-language Output in Planning Science Since 2003
【24h】

To the Gap Between Theory-based Planning Research and Planning Practice. An Examination of Large Parts of the German-language Output in Planning Science Since 2003

机译:基于理论的规划研究与规划实践之间的差距。 2003年以来规划科学中德语输出大部分地区的审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article a major part of the German-language output in spatial sciences between 2003 and 2014 is examined towards a supposed gap between theory-based research and planning practice. Thus a total of 1929 articles contained in scientific series of the Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (ARL) and three journals is analysed to different degrees of detailing. In the first step, a classification was conducted in order to organise the empirical results. In a second step, detailed analyses were followed. The assumption of a gap all in all is confirmed: Only a small part of the examined articles argues visible theorybased. And within these articles the empirical examination of theories mostly is succeeding only rudimentary and the practical benefit of the research results is rarely noticeable. This finding as well shows, that the requirement of transdisciplinarity in the planning sciences can only partly be fulfilled. This could be the result from reasons in between the system of research as well as in conceptual deficits in the planning research itself.
机译:在本文中,2003年至2014年间空间科学中的德语输出的主要部分是对理论的研究和规划实践之间的假定差距。因此,1929年由1929年含有的AkademieFüraumforschungund Landesplanung(ARL)和三个期刊中包含的文章分析到不同程度的细节。在第一步中,进行分类,以组织经验结果。在第二步中,遵循详细分析。所有内容的假设都得到了证实:只有一小部分被检查的物品认为理论基础。在这些文章中,实证审查的理论主要是取得的成功,并且研究结果的实际好处很少明显。这一发现还显示,规划科学中的跨学科的要求只能部分地实现。这可能是研究体系之间的原因以及规划研究本身的概念赤字。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号