...
首页> 外文期刊>Research in Veterinary Science >Evaluating the application of the dual path platform VetTB test for badgers (Meles meles) in the test and vaccinate or remove (TVR) wildlife research intervention project in Northern Ireland
【24h】

Evaluating the application of the dual path platform VetTB test for badgers (Meles meles) in the test and vaccinate or remove (TVR) wildlife research intervention project in Northern Ireland

机译:评估双路径平台VETTB试验在北爱尔兰试验和接种的獾(MELES MELES)中的应用(MELES MELES)进行疫苗或移除(TVR)野生动物研究干预项目

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

European badgers (Meles meles) are accepted as a wildlife reservoir host for Mycobacterium bovis, which causes bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in the British Isles. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of Dual Path Platform (DPP) VetTB test (Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc., Medford, NY, USA) within a Test and Vaccinate or Remove (TVR) wildlife research intervention project. Blood samples were collected from 456 individual badgers, trapped in 2015 and 2016, and tested in the field with DPP VetTB test using whole blood. Additionally, whole blood and serum samples were taken to the laboratory for further DPP VetTB testing and for gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) testing. Swabs were taken from the oropharynx and trachea and submitted for bacteriological culture as were swabs from wounds, if present. Field DPP VetTB test positive badgers were euthanised and underwent postmortem examination and bTB confirmatory testing. The results demonstrated that the test performed as well in the field using whole blood as DPP Vet TB tests in the laboratory using sera or whole blood, and as well as other established tests for M. bovis. Visual assessment of the DPP VetTB test using serum under laboratory conditions showed a high degree of consistency between raters. Using a relative gold standard (parallel interpretation of IFN-y assay and oropharyngeal/tracheal sample/culture), sensitivity estimates for the DPP VetTB test using sera and whole blood were 0.5 (95%CI 0.34-0.66) and 0.42 (95%CI 0.24-0.66), respectively. Specificity estimates were 0.95 (95%CI 0.93-0.97) for sera and 0.89 (95%CI 0.86-0.92) for whole blood. Parallel interpretation of Band 1 (MPB83) and Band 2 (CFP-10/ESAT-6) of the DPP VetTB test was not superior to interpretation of Band 1 only. The results give confidence in the reliability and reproducibility of the DPP VetTB test for badgers under field conditions and therefore it is considered appropriate for use in a badger bTB control campaign.
机译:欧洲獾(MELES MELES)被认为是牛杆菌的野生动物储层宿主,这导致英国群岛的牛结核病(BTB)。本研究的目的是评估使用双路径(DPP)VETTB测试(Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc.,Medford,Ny,USA)在测试和疫苗或删除(TVR)野生动物研究干预项目中。从456个个体獾收集血液样本,在2015年和2016年被困,并在现场测试了DPP VETTB使用全血。此外,将全血和血清样品用于实验室,用于进一步DPP VETTB测试和γ干扰素(IFN-Gamma)测试。拭子是从口咽和气管中取出的,并且如果存在的话,从伤口的拭子被提交的细菌学培养物。现场DPP VETTB测试正面獾被安乐死,并进行了淘汰后的淘汰赛检查和BTB确认测试。结果表明,在实验室中也在现场进行的测试在实验室中使用血清或全血,以及其他已建立的M. Bovis测试。在实验室条件下使用血清的DPP VETTB测试的视觉评估显示了评估者之间的高度一致性。使用相对金标准(IFN-Y测定和口咽/气管样品/培养的并行解释),使用血清和全血的DPP VETTB测试的敏感性估计为0.5(95%CI 0.34-0.66)和0.42(95%CI 0.24-0.66)分别。血清的特异性估计为0.95(95%CI 0.93-0.97),适用于全血0.89(95%CI 0.86-0.92)。 DPP VETTB测试的频带1(MPB83)和带2(CFP-10 / ESAT-6)的并行解释并不优于频段1的解释。结果对现场条件下的獾的可靠性和再现性提供了对獾的可靠性和再现性,因此它被认为是适合于獾BTB控制活动的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号