首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Impacts of protected areas on local livelihoods: Evidence of giant panda biosphere reserves in Sichuan Province, China
【24h】

Impacts of protected areas on local livelihoods: Evidence of giant panda biosphere reserves in Sichuan Province, China

机译:保护区对当地生计的影响:中国四川省大熊猫生物圈储备证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Highlights?Matching was used to appraise the impacts of protected area on livelihoods.?Traditional regression exaggerated the negative impacts of the protected area.?The overall impact of protected area on households’ wealth was negative.Given the debates about whether Protected Areas (PAs) exacerbate local poverty or might contribute to poverty alleviation, there is a critical need for evidence to examine the impacts. In this study, we have conducted a household investigation of 560 rural households in 7 PAs of Sichuan province of China. We used matching method to value impacts of PAs on local livelihoods. The results showed that compared to the Average Treatment Effect, the results of traditional regression model exaggerate the negative impacts of the PAs. However, we should notice that the overall impact of PAs on local household wealth was still negative. Households inside the PAs had more Non-timber Forest Products gathering income and compensation, but fewer crop production income and forestry income. Better conservation policies need to be initiated to realize the harmonious and concurrent development of ecological objectives and livelihood objectives.
机译:亮点?匹配用于评估保护区对生计的影响。夸大了保护区的负面影响。?保护区对家庭财富的整体影响是负面的。关于保护区的辩论(PAS )加剧当地贫困或可能有助于减轻扶贫,有危急需要证据审查影响。在这项研究中,我们在中国四川省7个PAS中进行了一家对560家农村家庭的家庭调查。我们使用匹配方法对PA对当地生计的影响。结果表明,与平均治疗效果相比,传统回归模型的结果夸大了PA的负面影响。但是,我们应该注意到PA对当地家庭财富的总体影响仍然是负面影响。 PAS内的家庭有更多的非木材森林产品收集收入和补偿,但作物生产收入和林业收入较少。需要启动更好的保护政策,以实现生态目标和生计目标的和谐和同时发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号