首页> 外文期刊>Nursing ethics >The value of metaphorical reasoning in bioethics: An empirical-ethical study
【24h】

The value of metaphorical reasoning in bioethics: An empirical-ethical study

机译:生物伦理学中隐喻推理的价值:一个经验伦理研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Metaphors are often used within the context of ethics and healthcare but have hardly been explored in relation to moral reasoning. Objective: To describe a central set of metaphors in one case and to explore their contribution to moral reasoning. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 parents of a child suffering from the neurodegenerative disease CLN3. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and metaphors were analyzed. The researchers wrote memos and discussed about their analyses until they reached consensus. Ethical considerations: Participants gave oral and written consent and their confidentiality and anonymity were respected. Findings: A central set of metaphors referred to the semantic field of the hands and arms and consisted of two central metaphors that existed in a dialectical relationship: grasping versus letting go. Participants used these metaphors to describe their child's experiences, who had to "let go" of abilities, while "clinging" to structures and the relationship with their parent(s). They also used it to describe their own experiences: participants tried to "grab" the good moments with their child and had to "let go" of their child when (s)he approached death. Participants, in addition, "held" onto caring for their child while being confronted with the necessity to "let go" of this care, leaving it to professional caregivers. Discussion: The ethical analysis of the findings shows that thinking in terms of the dialectical relationship between "grasping" and "letting go" helps professional caregivers to critically think about images of good care for children with CLN3. It also helps them to bear witness to the vulnerable, dependent, and embodied nature of the moral self of children with CLN3 and their parents. Conclusion: Metaphorical reasoning may support the inclusion of marginalized perspectives in moral reasoning. Future studies should further explore the contribution of metaphorical reasoning to moral reasoning in other cases.
机译:背景:隐喻通常在道德和医疗保健的背景下使用,但几乎没有与道德推理有关的探讨。目的:在一个案例中描述一组中央隐喻,探索他们对道德推理的贡献。方法:半结构性访谈与患有神经退行性疾病Cln3的儿童的16名父母进行。分析了采访,转录和隐喻。研究人员写了备忘录并讨论了他们的分析,直到他们达成共识。道德考虑因素:参与者给予了口头和书面同意,尊重他们的保密和匿名性。调查结果:一套中央隐喻,引用了手和武器的语义领域,并由两个中央隐喻组成,这些中央隐喻在辩证关系中存在:抓住与放手。与会者使用这些隐喻来描述他们孩子的经验,他们不得不“放手”的能力,同时“坚持”到结构和与他们的父母的关系。他们还用它来描述自己的经历:参与者试图“抓住”与孩子的好时光,并且在他接近死亡时不得不“放手”。另外,参与者“举行”在关心他们的孩子的同时面临着“放手”这项照顾的必要性,将其留给专业的护理人员。讨论:对调查结果的道德分析表明,在“抓住”和“放手”之间的辩证关系方面的思考有助于专业的护理人员对CLN3的儿童妥善考虑良好照顾的图像。它还有助于他们见证与Cln3及其父母的易受伤害的,依赖和体现性质的易受攻击的,依赖和体现性质。结论:隐喻推理可能支持在道德推理中包含边缘化视角。未来的研究将进一步探索隐喻推理在其他案例中的道德推理的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号