首页> 外文期刊>Neurogastroenterology and motility >Validation of SmartPill ? ? wireless motility capsule for gastrointestinal transit time: Intra‐subject variability, software accuracy and comparison with video capsule endoscopy
【24h】

Validation of SmartPill ? ? wireless motility capsule for gastrointestinal transit time: Intra‐subject variability, software accuracy and comparison with video capsule endoscopy

机译:验证SmartPill? 还 用于胃肠输送时间的无线运动胶囊:内部内部可变性,软件准确性和与视频胶囊内窥镜的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background There is interest in ultimately combining endoscopy and motility assessments. Gastric emptying ( GET ), small bowel ( SBTT ), colon ( CTT ) and whole gut transit ( WGTT ) times are conveniently obtained by SmartPill ? wireless motility capsule ( WMC ) that records luminal pH , temperature and pressure. Reproducibility within same subjects and accuracy of software derived times (Motili GI ? ) were investigated for diagnostic application. GET and SBTT were separately measured using video capsule endoscopy ( VCE ). The aim of this investigation was to assess same subject reproducibility of WMC , accuracy of software derived transit times and relate to Pillcam ? SB (small bowel) VCE motility data. Methods Seventy three healthy adults ingested a 260?kcal mixed meal followed by WMC tests. Food intake was permitted after 6?hours. Regional transit data was obtained for GET , SBTT and CTT , the sum yielding WGTT . Nineteen subjects repeated WMC tests 2 or 4?weeks later; a separate 70 underwent VCE while fasted. Key Results Visually derived data from WMC yielded GET 3.46±0.27, SBTT 5.15±0.21, CTT 20.76±1.19 and WGTT 29.53±1.28?hours (mean± SEM ). Pearson's correlation coefficients ( r ) against software derived results were: GET 0.78 ( P .0001), SBTT 0.28 ( P .05), CTT 0.96 ( P .0001), WGTT 0.99 ( P .0001). VCE yielded lower GET (0.71±0.08?hours) and SBTT (4.15±0.13?hours). Conclusions and Inferences GET , SBTT , CTT and WGTT obtained by WMC are commensurate with literature values, including by other methods. Visually and software derived transit times have strongest correlations for CTT and WGTT . WMC yields longer GET and SBTT than VCE , perhaps due to meal related effects on motility.
机译:抽象背景有兴趣最终结合内窥镜检查和运动评估。胃排空(Get),小肠(SBTT),结肠(CTT)和整个肠道过境(WGTT)时间是方便的,通过SmartPill可以方便地获得?无线运动胶囊(WMC)记录腔体pH值,温度和压力。研究了在同一主题和软件衍生时间(Motili Gi?)的同一主题和准确性中的再现性进行诊断应用。使用视频胶囊内窥镜(VCE)单独测量Get和SBTT。这项调查的目的是评估WMC的相同主题再现性,软件衍生的过境时间和占Pillcam的精度并与Pillcam有关的准确性? SB(小肠)VCE运动数据。方法七十三名健康成年人摄入260克尔混合粉,随后是WMC检验。 6?小时后允许食物摄入量。获得的区域过境数据获得Get,SBTT和CTT,总和产生WGTT。 19名受试者重复WMC测试2或4个?几周后;一个单独的70在禁食时接受了vce。关键结果来自WMC的视觉衍生数据,得到3.46±0.27,SBTT 5.15±0.21,CTT 20.76±1.19和WGTT 29.53±1.28?小时(平均值±SEM)。 Pearson对软件衍生结果的相关系数(R)是:获得0.78(P& .0001),SBTT 0.28(P <.05),CTT 0.96(P <.0001),WGTTT 0.99(P <.0001 )。 VCE产生较低的GET(0.71±0.08?小时)和SBTT(4.15±0.13?小时)。通过WMC获得的SBTT,CTT和WGTT的结论和推迟与文献值相称,包括其他方法。目视和软件导出的运输时间对CTT和WGTT具有最强的相关性。 WMC产生比VCE更长,也许是由于膳食对动机的含量相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号