首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews neuroscience >Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity
【24h】

Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity

机译:朝着积极抽样和好奇心的神经科学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In natural behaviour, animals actively interrogate their environments using endogenously generated 'question-and-answer' strategies. However, in laboratory settings participants typically engage with externally imposed stimuli and tasks, and the mechanisms of active sampling remain poorly understood. We review a nascent neuroscientific literature that examines active-sampling policies and their relation to attention and curiosity. We distinguish between information sampling, in which organisms reduce uncertainty relevant to a familiar task, and information search, in which they investigate in an open-ended fashion to discover new tasks. We review evidence that both sampling and search depend on individual preferences over cognitive states, including attitudes towards uncertainty, learning progress and types of information. We propose that, although these preferences are non-instrumental and can on occasion interfere with external goals, they are important heuristics that allow organisms to cope with the high complexity of both sampling and search, and generate curiosity-driven investigations in large, open environments in which rewards are sparse and ex ante unknown.
机译:在自然行为中,动物使用内源生成的“问答”策略积极询问他们的环境。然而,在实验室设置中,参与者通常与外部施加的刺激和任务接合,并且主动抽样的机制仍然明白很差。我们审查了一个新生的神经科学文献,审查了主动抽样政策及其与关注和好奇心的关系。我们区分信息采样,其中生物体可以减少与熟悉的任务和信息搜索相关的不确定性,其中他们以开放式时尚调查,以发现新任务。我们审查了抽样和搜索的证据取决于对认知状态的个人偏好,包括对不确定性的态度,学习进度和信息类型。我们提出了,尽管这些偏好是非乐器,但可能有时会干扰外部目标,它们是允许生物应对采样和搜索的高复杂性的重要启发式,并在大型开放环境中产生好奇心驱动的调查其中奖励是稀疏和前旁的未知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号