Ab'/> GCP and Quality in “Regulation (EU) 536/2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use and repealing Directive 2001/20/EU”
首页> 外文期刊>Microchemical Journal: Devoted to the Application of Microtechniques in all Branches of Science >GCP and Quality in “Regulation (EU) 536/2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use and repealing Directive 2001/20/EU”
【24h】

GCP and Quality in “Regulation (EU) 536/2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use and repealing Directive 2001/20/EU”

机译:“条例(欧盟)536/2014关于人类使用和废除指令2001/20 /欧盟的临床试验中的”条例(欧盟)536/2014“

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AbstractAmong the several new provisions foreseen by the EU Regulation (R) 2014/536 on Clinical Trials (CTs) repealing Directive (D) 2001/20/EC, this article focuses on the identification of possible critical points leading to potential incongruences regarding Good Clinical Practice (GCP). EU D foresees the obligation to be in compliance with GCP detailed guidelines, while the R foresees the obligation to be in compliance only with the GCP principles. Many of the GCP detailed aspects have been transposed in the R and the R provides to be in compliance with GCP quality standards. Nevertheless, other GCP aspects, which have direct or indirect ethical implication in CTs, will not be mandatory in the EU.Highlights?The importance of the Good Clinical Practice in the conduction of a clinical trial?The EU Regulation (R) No. 536/2014 and its compliance with the GCP?Differences between the EU Regulation (R) No. 536/2014 and the current legislation?
机译:<![cdata [ 抽象 在欧盟法规(R)2014/536对临床试验(CTS)废除的几个新规定中指令(d)2001/20 /欧共体,本文重点介绍了识别可能的关键点,导致有关良好的临床实践(GCP)的潜在不一致。欧盟D预计符合GCP详细指引的义务,而R预见仅符合GCP原则的义务。许多GCP详细方面已经在R中转移,R提供符合GCP质量标准。然而,其他GCP方面在CTS中具有直接或间接伦理的伦理意义,在欧盟中不会是强制性的。 突出显示 良好临床实践的重要性在临床试验中的传导中 欧盟规则(R)第536/2014号和其合规性使用gcp 欧盟规则(R)第536/2014号的差异及CUR租赁立法

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号