...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical oncology >Effect of transplant status in CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Effect of transplant status in CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:移植状态在CD19针对型汽车T细胞疗法中的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown promise for relapsed/refractory malignancies. Many patients have undergone prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), yet effects of transplant status on CAR T-cell therapy efficacy and safety have not been reported. The purpose of the study is to systematically evaluate the likelihood of achieving optimum response, severe cytokine release syndrome (sCRS), and neurotoxicity in the context of CAR T-cell therapy for HSCT-naive patients versus those with prior HSCT. Trials were identified in ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and PubMed, and through reference pearl growing. Included studies used CD19-directed CAR T-cells for relapsed/refractory B-lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and B cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, enrolled both HSCT-naive and prior-HSCT patients, and denoted transplant status with outcomes. Six studies were included for optimum response, five for sCRS incidence, and four for neurotoxicity incidence. The pooled odds ratio for optimum response was 1.57 favoring HSCT-naive patients (95% CI 0.54-4.61), whereas the pooled odds ratios for sCRS and neurotoxicity were 1.41 (95% CI 0.51-3.94) and 1.37 (95% CI 0.28-6.77), respectively, toward HSCT-naive patients. Odds ratios were non-statistically significant. Overall risk of bias was moderate. While pooled estimates showed an advantage among HSCT-naive patients for achieving optimum response and increased likelihood for sCRS and neurotoxicity, findings were not statistically significant. Any differences in efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy cannot be verifiably attributed to transplant status, and additional controlled trials with increased sample sizes are needed to determine whether suggestive patterns favoring HSCT-naive patients are validated.
机译:嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法表明了复发/难治性恶性肿瘤的承诺。许多患者经历了现有的造血干细胞移植(HSCT),但尚未报道移植地位对汽车T细胞治疗效能和安全性的影响。该研究的目的是系统地评估实现最佳反应,严重的细胞因子释放综合征(SCR)和神经毒性在HSCT-NAIVIVE患者的CAR T细胞治疗中的神经毒性与先前的HSCT。试验在Clincoricaltrials.gov,Cochrane图书馆和Pubmed中鉴定,并通过参考珍珠生长。包括的研究使用CD19针对复发/难治性B族急性淋巴细胞白血病和B细胞慢性淋巴细胞白血病的CD19针对型汽车T细胞,注册了HSCT-NAIVE和PRESCT-HSCT患者,并用结果表示移植状态。包括六项研究以获得最佳反应,5例用于SCR发病率,4个用于神经毒性发生率。最佳反应的汇集赔率比为1.57个优惠HSCT-NAIVIVE患者(95%CI 0.54-4.61),而SCR和神经毒性的合并的差距为1.41(95%CI 0.51-3.94)和1.37(95%CI 0.28- 6.77)分别向HSCT-NAIVIVE患者。大量比率是非统计学意义。偏见的总体风险适度。虽然汇集估计显示HSCT-NAIVIVE患者的优势,用于实现疾病和神经毒性的最佳反应和增加的可能性,结果没有统计学意义。无需验证汽车T细胞疗法的疗效和安全性的任何差异,归因于移植状态,并且需要增加样本尺寸的额外对照试验来确定是否有利于HSCT-NAIVIVE患者的暗示模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号