首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >Variations of target volume definition and daily target volume localization in stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients under abdominal compression
【24h】

Variations of target volume definition and daily target volume localization in stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients under abdominal compression

机译:腹部压缩术后早期非小细胞肺癌患者立体定向体放射治疗靶体积定义和日常靶量定位的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We aimed to compare gross tumor volumes (GTV) in 3-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) simulation and daily cone beam CT (CBCT) with the internal target volume (ITV) in 4-dimensional CT (4DCT) simulation in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) under abdominal compression. We retrospectively selected 10 patients with NSCLC who received image-guided SBRT treatments under abdominal compression with daily CBCT imaging. GTV5 were contoured as visible gross tumor on the planning 3DCT and daily CBCT, and ITVs were contoured using maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of the planning 4DCT. Daily CBCTs were registered with 3DCT and MIP images by matching of bony landmarks in the thoracic region to evaluate interfractional GTV position variations. Relative to MIP-based ITVs, the average 3DCT-based GTV volume was 66.3 +/- 17.1% (range: 37.5% to 92.0%) (p < 0.01 in paired t-test), and the average CBCT-based GTV volume was 90.0 +/- 6.7% (daily range: 75.7% to 107.1%) (p = 0.02). Based on bony anatomy matching, the center-of-mass coordinates for CBCT-based GTVs had maximum absolute shift of 2.4 mm (left-right), 7.0 mm (anterior posterior [AP]), and 5.2 mm (superior-inferior [SI]) relative to the MIP-based ITV. CBCT-based GTV5 had average overlapping ratio of 81.3 +/- 11.2% (range: 45.1% to 98.9%) with the MIP-based ITV, and 57.7 +/- 13.7% (range: 35.1% to 83.2%) with the 3DCT-based GTV. Even with abdominal compression, both 3DCT simulations and daily CBCT scans significantly underestimated the full range of tumor motion. In daily image guided patient setup corrections, automatic bony anatomy-based image registration could lead to target misalignment. Soft tissue-based image registration should be performed for accurate treatment delivery. (C) 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
机译:我们旨在将3维计算断层扫描(3DCT)模拟(3DCT)模拟和日常锥形梁CT(CBCT)的总肿瘤体积(GTV)与立体定向体放射治疗中的4维CT(4DCT)模拟中的内部目标体积(ITV)进行比较( SBRT)在腹部压缩下治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的患者。我们回顾性地选择了10例NSCLC患者,他在每日CBCT成像下接受腹部压缩的图像引导的SBRT治疗。 GTV5在规划3DCT和每日CBCT上以可见的粗略肿瘤呈现,并且使用规划4DCT的最大强度投影(MIP)图像来设计ITV。每日CBCTS通过胸部地区的骨骼地标在胸部地标在胸部地标进行注册,以评估跨非动态GTV位置变化。相对于基于MIP的ITV,基于3DCT的GTV体积为66.3 +/-17.1%(范围:37.5%至92.0%)(配对T检验中的P <0.01),并且基于CBCT的GTV体积是90.0 +/- 6.7%(每日范围:75.7%至107.1%)(P = 0.02)。基于骨骼解剖匹配,基于CBCT的GTV的质量坐标最大的绝对偏移2.4 mm(左右),7.0 mm(前后[AP])和5.2 mm(优越的[Si ])相对于基于MIP的ITV。基于CBCT的GTV5的平均重叠比率为81.3 +/- 11.2%(范围:45.1%至98.9%),基于MIP的ITV,57.7 +/- 13.7%(范围:35.1%至83.2%),3DCT基于GTV。即使腹部压缩,3DCT模拟和每日CBCT扫描也显着低估了全系列的肿瘤运动。在日常图像引导患者设置矫正中,自动骨骼解剖学图像配准可能导致目标未对准。应进行软组织的图像配准,以进行准确的治疗递送。 (c)2017年美国医疗剂量分子协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号