...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology research and practice >Liver Transplantation from Voluntary Organ Donor System in China: A Comparison between DBD and DCD Liver Transplants
【24h】

Liver Transplantation from Voluntary Organ Donor System in China: A Comparison between DBD and DCD Liver Transplants

机译:中国自愿器官捐赠系统的肝移植:DBD和DCD肝移植的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. In China, the cases of liver transplantation (LT) from donation after citizens’ death have rose year by year since the citizen-based voluntary organ donor system was initiated in 2010. The objective of our research was to investigate the early postoperative and late long-term outcomes of LT from donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) according to the current organ donation system in China. Methods. Sixty-two consecutive cases of LT from donation after citizens’ death performed in our hospital between February 2012 and June 2017 were examined retrospectively for short- and long-term outcomes. These included 35 DCD LT and 27 DBD LT. Result. Subsequent median follow-up time of 19 months and 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were comparative between the DBD group and the DCD group (81.5% and 66.7% versus 67.1% and 59.7%; P=0.550), as were patient survival rates (85.2% and 68.7% versus 72.2% and 63.9%; P=0.358). The duration of ICU stay of recipients was significantly shorter in the DBD group, in comparison with that of the DCD group (1 versus 3 days, P=0.001). Severe complication incidence (≥grade III) after transplantation was identical among the DBD and DCD groups (48.1% versus 60%, P=0.352). There was no significant difference in postoperative mortality between the DBD and DCD groups (3 of 27 cases versus 5 of 35 cases). Twenty-one grafts (33.8%) were lost and 18 recipients (29.0%) were dead till the time of follow-up. Malignancy recurrence was the most prevalent reason for patient death (38.8%). There was no significant difference in incidence of biliary stenosis between the DBD and DCD groups (5 of 27 cases versus 6 of 35 cases, P=0.846). Conclusion. Although the sample size was small to some extent, this single-center study first reported that LT from DCD donors showed similar short- and long-term outcomes with DBD donors and justified the widespread implementation of voluntary citizen-based deceased organ donation in China. However, the results should be verified with a multicenter larger study.
机译:背景。在中国,自公民的志愿器官捐助机构于2010年开始逐年捐赠肝移植案(LT)的案件逐渐上涨。我们的研究目标是调查术后和深夜的早期根据当前中国当前器官捐赠制度捐赠脑死亡(DBD)和捐赠后捐赠的捐赠和捐赠的捐赠。方法。在2012年2月与2017年2月至2017年2月至2017年6月在我们的医院进行的捐赠后捐赠六十两次举行回顾性地进行短期和长期成果。这些包括35 dcd lt和27 dbd lt。结果。 DBD组和DCD组之间的后续中位后续时间为19个月和1岁和3年的移植物存活率(81.5%和66.7%,而67.1%和59.7%; p = 0.550),患者存活率(85.2%和68.7%,而72.2%和63.9%; P = 0.358)。与DCD组的DBD组ICU的ICU持续期持续时间明显较短(1与3天,P = 0.001)。移植后的严重并发症发生率(≥GradeICI)在DBD和DCD组中相同(48.1%,对60%,P = 0.352)。 DBD和DCD组之间的术后死亡率没有显着差异(35例中的3例,共35例中的3例)。丢失了二十一条移植(33.8%),直到随访时间死亡,18名受者(29.0%)死亡。恶性复发是患者死亡最普遍的原因(38.8%)。 DBD和DCD组之间的胆管狭窄发病率没有显着差异(第5例,第6例,P = 0.846)。结论。虽然样品大小在某种程度上很小,但这种单一中心研究首先报道,来自DCD捐助者的LT与DBD捐助者表现出类似的短期和长期成果,并证明了中国自愿公民的普遍实施。但是,应通过多中心更大的研究验证结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号