...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology >Efficacies of Genotypic Resistance-Guided vs Empirical Therapy for Refractory Helicobacter pylori Infection
【24h】

Efficacies of Genotypic Resistance-Guided vs Empirical Therapy for Refractory Helicobacter pylori Infection

机译:基因型抗性导向的效果对难治性幽门螺杆菌感染的效果疗法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background & AimsWe aimed to compare the efficacy of genotypic resistance–guided therapy vs empirical therapy for eradication of refractoryHelicobacter pyloriinfection in randomized controlled trials. MethodsWe performed 2 multicenter, open-label trials of patients withH pyloriinfection (20 years or older) failed by 2 or more previous treatment regimens, from October 2012 through September 2017 in Taiwan. The patients were randomly assigned to groups given genotypic resistance–guided therapy for 14 days (n?= 21 in trial 1, n?= 205 in trial 2) or empirical therapy according to medication history for 14 days (n?= 20 in trial 1, n?= 205 in trial 2). Patients received sequential therapy containing esomeprazole and amoxicillin for the first 7 days, followed by esomeprazole and metronidazole, with levofloxacin, clarithromycin, or tetracycline (doxycycline in trial 1, tetracycline in trial 2) for another 7 days (all given twice daily) based on genotype markers of resistance determined from gastric biopsy specimens (group A) or empirical therapy according to medication history. Resistance-associated mutations in 23S ribosomal RNA or gyrase A were identified by polymerase chain reaction with direct sequencing. Eradication status was determined by13C-urea breath test. The primary outcome was eradication rate. ResultsH pyloriinfection was eradicated in 17 of 21 (81%) patients receiving genotype resistance–guided therapy and 12 of 20 (60%) patients receiving empirical therapy (P?= .181) in trial 1. This trial was terminated ahead of schedule due to the low rate of eradication in patients given doxycycline sequential therapy (15 of 26 [57.7%]). In trial 2,H pyloriinfection was eradicated in 160 of 205 (78%) patients receiving genotype resistance–guided therapy and 148 of 205 (72.2%) patients receiving empirical therapy (P?= .170), according to intent to treat analysis. The frequencies of adverse effects and compliance did not differ significantly between groups. ConclusionsProperly designed empirical therapy, based on medication history, is an acceptable alternative to genotypic resistance–guided therapy for eradication of refractoryH pyloriinfection after consideration of accessibility, cost, and patient preference.ClinicalTrials.govID:NCT01725906.
机译:背景和AIMSWE旨在比较基因型抵抗引导治疗对无规集对照试验中难治性的幽门螺杆菌消除难以触发的幽门螺杆菌的疗效。方法对象进行了2个多中心,患有幽门螺杆菌(20岁或以上)的多中心的开放标签试验,在2012年10月至2017年9月在2017年10月至2017年9月在台湾失败。患者被随机分配给赋予给定基因型抗性导向治疗的组14天(试验1,= 205在试验中的21例)或根据药物历史的经验治疗14天(N?= 20在试验中1,n?= 205在试验2)。患者接受含有EsomePrazole和阿莫西林的连续治疗的前7天,其次是eSomeprazole和甲硝唑,用左氧氟沙星,克罗基霉素或四环素(在试验中的十二胞环素,试验2中的四环素)另外7天(每日给予两次)基于根据药物历史的胃活组织检查标本(A组)或经验疗法确定的抗性基因型标记物。通过与直接测序的聚合酶链反应鉴定23S核糖体RNA或乙酶A中的抗性相关突变。通过13C-UREA呼气测试确定了根除状态。主要结果是根除率。在21例(81%)患者中,接受基因型抗性导向治疗的17例和20名(60%)患者的患者在试验中接受经验治疗(P?= .181)的12名(p-= .181)中的12例。此试验提前终止给予患者的低萎缩率为1月胞环素顺序治疗(第26个中的15个[57.7%])。在试验2中,H幽门螺杆菌在205名(78%)患者的160名(78%)接受基因型抗性导向治疗的患者中和205例(72.2%)患者接受经验治疗(P?= .170),根据意图治疗分析。不利影响和遵守的频率在组之间没有显着差异。结论基于药物历史的基础设计的经验治疗是一种可接受的替代基因型抵抗导向治疗,用于在考虑可访问性,成本和患者偏好后消除难敏性幽门螺杆菌.ClinicalTials.govid:NCT01725906。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Gastroenterology》 |2018年第4期|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan;

    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Internal Medicine Chia-Yi Christian;

    Department of Medicine National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine and Taipei Veterans;

    Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch National;

    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan;

    Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch National;

    Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch National;

    School of Medicine Fu Jen Catholic University;

    Division of Gastroenterology Department of Internal Medicine Mackay Memorial Hospital Taitung;

    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan;

    School of Medicine Fu Jen Catholic University;

    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan;

    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Internal Medicine Taipei Medical;

    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan;

    Department of Pathology National Taiwan University Hospital National Taiwan University College of;

    Microbiome Research Centre St George and Sutherland Clinical School University of New South Wales;

    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Internal Medicine National Taiwan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 消化系及腹部疾病;
  • 关键词

    23S rRNA; Gyrase A; Susceptibility Testing; Third-Line;

    机译:23s rRNA;转酶a;易感性测试;第三行;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号