...
首页> 外文期刊>Foodborne pathogens and disease >Effects of Tylosin Administration Routes on the Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Among Fecal Enterococci of Finishing Swine
【24h】

Effects of Tylosin Administration Routes on the Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Among Fecal Enterococci of Finishing Swine

机译:甲骨蛋白给药途径对整理猪粪便肠道细胞抗微生物抗性患病率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Antibiotics can be administered orally or parenterally in swine production, which may influence antimicrobial resistance (AMR) development in gut bacteria. A total of 40 barrows and 40 gilts were used to determine the effects of tylosin administration route on growth performance and fecal enterococcal AMR. The antibiotic treatments followed Food and Drug Administration label directions and were as follows: (1) no antibiotic (CON), (2) 110 mg tylosin per kg feed for 21 d (IN-FEED), (3) 8.82 mg tylosin per kg body weight through intramuscular injection twice daily for the first 3 d of each week for 3 weeks (IM), and (4) 66 mg tylosin per liter of drinking water (IN-WATER). Antibiotics were administered during d 0 to 21 and all pigs were then fed the CON diet from d 21 to 35. Fecal samples were collected on d 0, 21, and 35. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by microbroth dilution method. No evidence of route x sex interaction (p > 0.55) was observed for growth performance. From d 0 to 21, pigs receiving CON and IN-FEED had greater (p < 0.05) average daily gain (ADG) than those receiving IM, with the IN-WATER group showing intermediate ADG. Pigs receiving CON had greater (p < 0.05) gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) than IM and IN-WATER, but were not different from pigs receiving IN-FEED. Overall, enterococcal isolates collected from pigs receiving IN-FEED or IM were more resistant (p < 0.05) to erythromycin and tylosin than CON and IN-WATER groups. Regardless of administration route, the estimated probability of AMR to these two antibiotics was greater on d 21 and 35 than on d 0. In summary, IM tylosin decreased ADG and G:F in finishing pigs, which may be because of a response to the handling during injection administration. Tylosin administration through injection and feed resulted in greater probability of enterococcal AMR to erythromycin and tylosin compared with in-water treatment.
机译:抗生素可以口服或肠胃外施用猪生产,这可能影响肠道细菌中的抗微生物抗性(AMR)发育。共使用40只猎犬和40个胃,用于确定泰罗斯林给途径对生长性能和粪便肠球菌AMR的影响。抗生素治疗遵循食品和药物管理标签方向,如下:(1)每kg饲料(饲料),(3)每kg / kg每kg饲料,每kg饲料通过肌内注射每天两次肌内注射的体重,每周的前3天,每升3周(IM),每升饮用水(在水中)66毫克Tylosin。在D 0至21期间施用抗生素,然后将所有猪从D 21至35中喂食。收集粪便样品在D 0,21和35上收集。通过微生物稀释方法测定抗微生物易感性。没有观察到X X性相互作用(p> 0.55)的证据,以实现增长性能。从D 0到21,接受Con和饲料的猪具有更大(P <0.05)的平均每日增益(ADG),而水的内部基团显示中间体ADG。猪接收到的猪具有比IM和水在水中更大(P <0.05)的增益 - 进给比(G:F),但与接受饲料的猪没有不同。总体而言,从饲料饲料或IM接受的猪收集的肠球菌分离株比CON和水溶液更具抗性(P <0.05)和替霉素。无论给药路径如何,D 21和35均估计AMR的概率大于D 0.总结中,IM Tylosin在整理猪中降低了ADG和G:F,这可能是因为对此的反应注射施用期间处理。通过注射和饲料给予Tylosin给药导致肠球菌AMR的概率更大,与水中处理相比,尖霉素和替斯皮肽。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号