首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based dentistry >Among orthodontic patients, does the use of reminder systems compared to no reminders improve periodontal parameters and appointment adherence?
【24h】

Among orthodontic patients, does the use of reminder systems compared to no reminders improve periodontal parameters and appointment adherence?

机译:在正畸患者中,是否使用提醒系统的使用与没有提醒相比,改善牙周参数和预约遵守?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Data sources Six electronic databases/registries including MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), LILACS, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science) were searched up to 1 January 2018. Additionally, ongoing and unpublished trials were sought as well as a manual search also to January 2018. No restrictions on language or publication date were set.Study selection Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing active orthodontic patients that received any type of reminder or not, and the impact of the reminder on periodontal parameters and/or rate of attendance, were included.Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers abstracted data independently after a customised data extraction form was piloted. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool. The results for periodontal parameters were synthesised (random effects meta-analysis) as mean difference or standardised mean difference with 95% CIs. Effects on attendance rate and frequency of white spots were synthesised (random effects meta-analysis) using relative risks (RR) with their 95% CIs where possible.Results Fourteen parallel-group RCTs involving 2,078 participants were included with 1,059 participants in the meta-analysis). Studies in different parts of the world were included. Different reminder systems were identified (SMS, mail, automatic phone calls, mobile apps). Outcomes considered were: plaque scores (ten RCTs), gingival scores (six RCTs), appointment attendance (five RCTs), white spot development (four RCTs), and other outcomes (one RCT). Three studies were judged at high RoB, six were unclear and five were at low RoB (not included in the meta-analysis). Plaque indices measured over a short time period were significantly affected (SMD .38; 95%CI: -0.65 to -0.10), and over longer term .Patients receiving reminders (SMD -1.51; 95%CI: -2.72 to -0.30)were less likely to miss appointments (RR 0.39; 95%CI: 0.22 to 0.70) or develop white spots (RR 0.45; 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.65) .Conclusions In general terms there is moderate-to-high quality of evidence that reminders have a positive effect on oral hygiene, improved appointment adherence and the reduction of white spot development.
机译:数据来源六个电子数据库/注册管理机构包括Medline,Cochrane中央登记册(中央),淡紫色,Embase,Scopus,科学网站,2018年1月1日。另外,寻求持续和未发表的审判以及一个手动搜索到2018年1月。设定了对语言或出版日期的限制.Study选择只评估有源正畸患者,这些患者接受任何类型的提醒,以及提醒对牙周参数的影响和/还包括出席率.Data提取和综合两种审阅者在试行定制的数据提取表格后独立抽象数据。使用偏置工具的Cochrane协作风险评估偏差(ROB)的风险。牙周参数的结果被合成(随机效应Meta-Analysis),与95%CIS的平均差异或标准化平均差异。使用相对风险(RR)与其95%CIS的相对风险(RR)合成(随机效应META分析)的效果(随机效应META分析),其中可能是涉及2,078名参与者的十四平行组RCT,其中1,059名参与者分析)。包括世界各地的研究。确定了不同的提醒系统(SMS,Mail,自动电话,移动应用程序)。考虑的结果是:斑块评分(十rcts),牙龈评分(六个RCT),预约出席(五个RCT),白斑发展(四个RCT)和其他结果(一个RCT)。三项研究在高抢劫中判断,六个尚不清楚,五个在低抢劫(不包括在Meta分析中)。在短时间内测量的斑块指数受到显着影响(SMD .38; 95%CI:-0.65至-0.10),以及超过长期的.Patiants接受提醒(SMD -1.51; 95%CI:-2.72至-0.30)不太可能错过约会(RR 0.39; 95%CI:0.22至0.70)或开发白斑(RR 0.45; 95%CI:0.31至0.65)。总之,总而言之有关的证据提醒对口腔卫生有积极影响,改善了预约遵守和白天发育的减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号