首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Lung Research >Inhaled salbutamol from aerolizer and diskus at different inhalation flows, inhalation volume and number of inhalations in both healthy subjects and COPD patients
【24h】

Inhaled salbutamol from aerolizer and diskus at different inhalation flows, inhalation volume and number of inhalations in both healthy subjects and COPD patients

机译:来自Aerolizer和Diskus的吸入Salbutamol,在不同的吸入流动,吸入体积和健康受试者和COPD患者的吸入量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the effect of inhalation-flow, inhalation-volume and number of inhalations on aerosol-delivery of inhaled-salbutamol from two different dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in both healthy-subjects and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Relative pulmonary-bioavailability and systemic-bioavailability of inhaled-salbutamol, delivered by Diskus and Aerolizer, was determined in 24-COPD patients and 24-healthy subjects. The healthy-subjects and the COPD-patients participated in the study for 7 days in which they received 4 study doses of 200 mu g salbutamol (one slow-inhalation, two slow-inhalations, one fast-inhalation, and two fast-inhalations) in four alternative days with 24 hr washout period after each dose. Two urine-samples were collected from each study subjects. The first was provided 30 min post inhalation (USAL0.5), as an index of relative pulmonary-bioavailability, and the second was pooled to 24 hr post inhalation (USAL24), as an index of systemic-bioavailability. Fast-inhalation resulted in significantly higher USAL0.5 and USAL24 than slow-inhalation (p<0.05) after one-inhalation in both healthy-subjects and COPD-patients but there was no significant difference between slow and fast-inhalation after two-inhalations. One-inhalation resulted in significantly higher USAL0.5 and USAL24 in healthy-subjects compared to COPD-patient at both slow and fast-inhalation (p<0.05) except USAL0.5 with Diskus at slow-inhalation there was no significant difference. Also, two-inhalations resulted in significantly higher USAL0.5 and USAL24 compared to one-inhalation at slow-inhalation only (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between Aerolizer and Diskus except in USAL0.5 of one slow-inhalation in both health-subjects and COPD-patients (p = 0.048 and 0.047, respectively). Device-formula relation is present at low inhalation-flow since Diskus resulted in significantly higher USAL0.5 and USAL24 in healthy-subjects compared to COPD-patient at slow inhalation than Aerolizer. It is essential to inhale-twice and as hard and deep as possible from each dose when using DPI especially with COPD-patients having poor inspiratory efforts such as elderly patients and children.
机译:本研究的目的是证明在健康受试者和慢性阻塞性肺病两种不同的干粉吸入器(DPIs)中吸入流动,吸入 - 体积和吸入的吸入 - 沙丁胺醇的吸入量的效果(COPD)患者。在24℃-COPD患者和24个健康的受试者中测定了用磁盘和空气器递送的吸入 - 沙丁胺醇的相对肺生物利用度和全身性生物利用度。健康的受试者和COPD患者参加了7天的研究,其中他们收到了4次研究剂量为200亩枸杞(一种缓慢吸入,两个缓慢吸入,一个快速吸入和两个快速吸入)在每次剂量后的24小时洗涤期的四天内。从每项研究受试者收集两种尿液样本。第一个被提供30分钟的吸入后(USAL0.5),作为相对肺生物利用度的指数,第二个被汇集到24小时后吸入(USAL24),作为全身性生物利用度的指标。快速吸入导致USAL0.5和USAL24显着高于缓慢吸入(P <0.05),在健康受试者和COPD患者中一次吸入后,但两次吸入后缓慢和快速吸入之间没有显着差异。与慢速和快速吸入(P <0.05)除USAL0.5后的慢速吸入除了USAL0.5外,单吸入导致健康受试者的USAL0.5和USAL24在健康受试者中产生显着更高。此外,与仅在缓慢吸入时的单吸入相比,双吸入导致USAL0.5和USAL24显着更高(P <0.05)。在健康受试者和COPD患者的一次缓慢吸入除了USAL0.5之外,Aeralizer和Diskus之间没有发现显着差异(分别分别为P = 0.048和0.047)。在低吸入流动的低吸入流动中,与患者在缓慢吸入时,在低吸入流动中存在于低吸入流动,其在健康受试者中导致缓慢的患者比空气器缓存。当使用DPI时,尤其是每次剂量的吸气 - 两次,尤其是患者,特别是在老年患者和儿童如老年患者和儿童等温和劳动中,这是至关重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号