...
首页> 外文期刊>European radiology >A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS (R) Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations
【24h】

A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS (R) Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations

机译:一种新的自动化方法,可根据BI-RADS(R)ATLAS第五版建议评估2D乳房X射线密度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ObjectivesRadiologists' visual assessment of breast mammographic density (BMD) is subject to inter-observer variability. We aimed to develop and validate a new automated software tool mimicking expert radiologists' consensus assessments of 2D BMD, as per BI-RADS V recommendations.MethodsThe software algorithm was developed using a concept of Manhattan distance to compare a patient's mammographic image to reference mammograms with an assigned BMD category. Reference databases were built from a total of 2289 pairs (cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique views) of 2D full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Each image was independently assessed for BMD by a consensus of radiologists specialized in breast imaging. A validation set of additional 800 image pairs was evaluated for BMD both by the software and seven blinded radiologists specialized in breast imaging. The median score was used for consensus. Software reproducibility was assessed using FFDM image pairs from 214 patients in the validation set to compare BMD assessment between left and right breasts.ResultsThe software showed a substantial agreement with the radiologists' consensus (unweighted =0.68, 95% CI 0.64-0.72) when considering the four breast density categories, and an almost perfect agreement (unweighted =0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.88) when considering clinically significant non-dense (A-B) and dense (C-D) categories. Correlation between left and right breasts was high (r(s)=0.87; 95% CI 0.84-0.90).ConclusionsBMD assessment by the software was strongly correlated to radiologists' consensus assessments of BMD. Its performance should be compared to other methods, and its clinical utility evaluated in a risk assessment model.Key Points center dot A new software tool assesses breast density in a standardized way.center dot The tool mimics radiologists' clinical assessment of breast density.center dot It may be incorporated in a breast cancer risk assessment model.
机译:ObjectiveSroologists的视觉评估乳房乳乳乳乳腺乳腺密度(BMD)受到观察者间变异性的影响。我们旨在开发和验证一种新的自动化软件工具,模仿专家放射科医生的2D BMD的共识评估,根据BI-RAD型V建议。方法是使用曼哈顿距离的概念开发了软件算法,将患者的乳房X光图像与参考乳房X光图进行比较指定的BMD类别。参考数据库由总共2289对(Cranio-Caudal和Medio-Wallal倾斜斜视)的2D全场数字乳房X线摄影(FFDM)建造。通过专门用于乳房成像的放射科医生共识,每个图像独立评估BMD。通过专门用于乳房成像的软件和七位盲声放射科医师评估额外800个图像对的验证集。中位数得分用于共识。使用来自214名患者的FFDM图像对评估软件再现性,以便在左右乳房之间进行比较BMD评估。在考虑时,软件与放射科医生的共识(未加权= 0.68,95%CI 0.64-0.72)表现出大量的协议在考虑临床显着的非密集(AB)和密集(CD)类别时,四个乳房密度类别和几乎完美的协议(未加权= 0.84,95%CI 0.80-0.0.88)。左右乳房之间的相关性高(R(S)= 0.87; 95%CI 0.84-0.90)。软件的ConclusionsBMD评估与放射科医师对BMD的共识评估强烈相关。其性能应与其他方法进行比较,其在风险评估模型中评估其临床公用事业.Key点中心点新的软件工具以标准化的方式评估乳房密度。Center Dot该工具模仿放射学家的乳房密度的临床评估。点可以纳入乳腺癌风险评估模型中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号