首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer: official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) >Is initial excision of cutaneous melanoma by General Practitioners (GPs) dangerous? Comparing patient outcomes following excision of melanoma by GPs or in hospital using national datasets and meta-analysis
【24h】

Is initial excision of cutaneous melanoma by General Practitioners (GPs) dangerous? Comparing patient outcomes following excision of melanoma by GPs or in hospital using national datasets and meta-analysis

机译:是通过普通从业者(GPS)危险的初始切除皮肤黑色素瘤的切除症? 通过GPS或使用国家数据集和荟萃分析,比较患者结果后切除黑素瘤后切除黑素瘤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Melanomas are initially excised in primary care, and rates vary internationally. Until now, there has been no strong evidence one way or the other that excising melanomas in primary care is safe or unsafe. European guidelines make no recommendations, and the United Kingdom (UK) melanoma guidelines require all suspicious skin lesions to be initially treated in secondary care based on an expert consensus, which lacks supporting evidence, that primary care excision represents substandard care. Despite this, studies have found that up to 20% of melanomas in the UK are excised by general practitioners (GPs). Patients receiving primary care melanoma excision may fear that their care is substandard and their long-term survival threatened, neither of which may be justified.
机译:背景:Melanomas最初在初级保健中切除,并且利率在国际上变化。 到目前为止,一方面没有强有力的证据,另一方面,在初级保健中切除黑素瘤是安全或不安全的。 欧洲指南没有提出建议,而英国(英国)黑色素瘤指南要求根据缺乏支持证据的专家共识,初级护理初步治疗所有可疑的皮肤病变,初级保健切除代表不合格护理。 尽管如此,研究发现,英国的高达20%的Melanomas被一般从业者(GPS)扩展。 接受初级护理黑色素瘤切除的患者可能担心他们的护理是不合格的,并且他们的长期生存受到威胁,这两个都没有合理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号